News & opinion on Greater China and the even Greater Beyond: by Biff Cappuccino.

Tuesday, December 07, 2004

Ch05 Soccer Match first draft (incomplete)

11000wds

I was supposed to be preparing for graduate school, but Frankie finagled tickets for a soccer game. One of which I promptly snatched up from him. I needed a break. A celebration of some kind. I just needed to unwind to get in the right mood for studying. I didn’t want to rush. I wanted to take things one step at a time.

Besides, even though soccer sounds like harmless fun, it's also a great opportunity to get in touch with the authentic Chinese people and their culture: to understand the Tao of Chinese soccer fans, to deconstruct the impact of Sunzi's “Art of War” on Chinese sports, to check out the socialist solidarity of the players, referees, and fans.

I met Frankie at the Mickey Mao the night before the game to snag the tickets and give him his cash. Having made money off me scalping, guilt must have pricked his conscience. He decided to look out for my best interests. This was a new role for him. He hummed and hawed at first before he got into character, “Hey, Charlie. You know. I mean. Um… What’s Charlene gonna say when she finds out?”

“And how’s that going to happen?”

“I don’t know. It’s a small town. Loose lips sink limp dicks. You know, that kind of thing.”

I cringed, “C’mon man, we’re talking about my wife. Don’t you think that’s kind of crude?”

He rolled his eyes, “Like she’s going to hear it?”

“I don’t know. Just, just try to be nice will you? Jeez… Try another flavor. This week’s personality just isn’t working out. Doesn’t suit you somehow.” He’d permed his hair and was growing a big balloon of an Afro. He was in a full length Muslim Shalwar Kameez and one of those squashy collapsing African hats. He looked like an African politician trying to get out the populist vote.

“Hey, there aren’t any sub-Saharan’s in this place. I’m the first. Don’t I deserve credit for this?”

“But you’re not black or Muslim. Your folks immigrated to Los Angeles from Buddhist Sri Lanka.”

“Didn’t some of the local people ask you if you were Japanese when you first got here?”

“Yeah, I guess… But…”

“But nothing. The whole point of being here is that I can be anyone I want. A fresh start. I could even be you if I wanted to. So you better be nice to me.”

“What?”

“Yeah, man. I could paint myself up as Bozo the Clown and tell them I belonged to some weird lost tribe of white people.”

“Yeah?” I was dubious.

“Sure, you know… Umm… Like the Ainu of Japan. They were Caucasian aborigines in Japan right? They’re extinct now. Went out like a candle in the 1970’s. You must have learned about them in one of your anthro classes. Even Canadian universities teach anthro right?”

“Don’t get started.”

“No, no. Check it out.” He started to get in to it, his arms shooting into a high pose, his voice that of a documentary narrator. “The hair represents the crescent moon on sacred nights; the rubber nose is the sacrosanct power of the harvest sun; the floppy overshoes grant me the power to walk over hallowed ground.” He looked at me normally now. I was on the verge of cracking up but he was deadly serious. “Dude, it’s like totally fun. So you mess with people a little bit. So whaaaat? Relax. Live a little. You’re so uptight. Such a straight white dude. Must be those long cold winters up in Canuckistan, man.”

“Leave Canada out of it. Besides, you know I’m live and let live. Just don’t get too weird on me.” I put my hands on my waist, “But some Nigerian’s going to come to town and punch you in the nose when he sees you. Nigerians are all over Hong Kong doing international trade. Real go-getters. They’re in Taiwan. Chengdu too. They’ll be here soon enough.”

“Yeah, yeah.”

“Nigerians are big. Well dressed and real polite too. But this,” and I pointed to his getup, “You’re pushing it.”

He waved me down, “Just enjoy the game bro. And get to your studies. I want to see you make it. Succeed.”

“You too my man.” I said. We shook hands heartily.

The next day, after Charlene was safely off to the office, I was off to the game. I was in a great mood.

I put on some of my most unfashionable, understated duds, as I always did when going to a game. I had on cheapo basketball sneakers -- the thin-soled kind that's hard on your feet but still popular with low-budget counter-culture types on college campuses today -- plus khaki slacks, an old T-shirt embossed with a Playboy bunny insignia and "Happy Rabbit Loves Everyone", and my ratty Twin Machine-Gun brand leather jacket which was cracked and frayed from wearing it on rainy days and failing to kneed it with oil. Either way I didn't want to attract attention in the stadium from some squad of beer guzzling, wolf whistling, rowdies. The Chinese version of the English yob. You never know what's going to happen when the home team gets upset and who the next target of convenience for the next hooting, self-affirming witch-hunt is going to be. Been there, seen that. Pumping fists, flailing arms, chanting, crazed eyes, wild stares, demonic grins. Scary stuff.

I walked over and looked into our mahogany dresser mirror. Hazel eyes, short auburn hair, a reddish pointy nose, a pinch of freckles, no facial hair. I decided against shaving and mussed up my hair a bit, wetting it down just enough to make it damp, and then pulled on a winter woolen cap. When I took the cap off, my hair would have that solid, helmet look. Using the wife's moose and aiming for that wiry out of control look was too much work.

I slouched.

I mused over how I'd walk once I got outside. Maybe the moon-trot: you straightened your legs completely and stamped the ground as you trotted to your destination. You looked, for all appearances, as if your limbs weren't quite long enough to reach the sidewalk. Or maybe the laborer's stagger: you hunched over and swung your arms wildly up and down while pounding the pavement in a rush. Or maybe the spineless waffle: you relaxed your upper body completely, rounding your shoulders and giving your back a curvature that knocked an inch or more from your height. Your arms hung by your side as you moved. Instead of a pimp-roll, this was a limp-roll. It was relaxing and non-invasive. Best suited for mingling and meandering. Yup that was the ticket.

You might think that just wearing local clothes and messing up my hair wouldn't make much difference. I'd still stick out like a sore thumb in the stadium. But actually, with fluent Chinese and a practiced confidence, you can persuade people of just about anything.

As I went out, I shut our flimsy screen door and turned over the bolt-lock twice on the burgundy designer sheet metal outer door. There were all sorts of clever thieves about.

Having locked up, I looked lovingly over the greenery on our extended balcony and then I ambled over to the elevator. It was already at my floor, the door gaping, but the elevator attendant wasn't inside. I took a look but he wasn't around.

I wanted to get a move on, but it was bad form to use the elevator yourself, to push the buttons with your own fingers.

It wasn't a class thing. The attendant was part of another government make-work project. Money and enterprise were everything these days. Working was positive. Regardless of the nature of the job. And there was a pervasive sympathy for anyone under the threat of losing their position. But who needed an attendant to push the elevator buttons when you had two hands?

I shouted, "Hey! Someone wants to take the elevator!"

Nothing happened, I shouted again. I was a rush dammit! The hell with local habits and customs. The hell with fitting in.

I barged into the elevator, and tripped as the floor level and elevator level were out of whack again. I fetched up on the chipped wicker chair the operator had installed for himself.

Catching my breath, I looked over the rest of his furniture. This was his office. At least it wasn't his home. There was a scratched desk complete with a reconstituted jam jar, a government issue thermos with a real cork stopper, a couple packs of Long Life monopoly cigarettes, and a tabloid magazine playing with fire and riding that fine line between commercial success and a gulag sentence. Just as the doors were beginning to jump and bump to a close, a hand jammed itself between the doors.

The doors opened again. It was our building's elevator operator. He's an old spry fellow, with a barrel chest, a buzz cut and a full outfit of fluffy Mao gear, with rubber flip-flops down below. Not only was he demonstrating solidarity with the old horror, but he wore these clothes as a warning, like the stripy yellow jacket of a wasp. He was also a practiced fibber full of vague stories of defeating the Japs and the Nationalists, thus earning his place at the national feed trough and getting this useless job in particular.

He rumbled sonorously, "Hey, this is my elevator." He meant it. As in, it was his, not ours, the rent-paying tenants. Smiling and looking me in the eye, "Don't touch those buttons. State property." Yeah, right.

He nodded to himself, hoping to inspire me to nod as well. I noticed he was back to wearing his lucky mood-watch. He’d given it up a while ago when he started taking the watch too seriously. It had set up a feedback loop with his emotions, which played havoc with his moods. At the moment, however, he was happy sucking on a toothpick in lieu of a cigarette. Both of which were pacifiers.

I was charmed by his chutzpah, his energy and gusto. But I was still in a rush, "Well I shouted for you, but nothing happened. Come on, old buddy, let's get this show on the road."

He put his hand over the floor buttons as if to keep them from harm's way. He turned a key to shut the elevator off. "Hold on there, sonny. You got a lighter?"

I groaned. He tried to suppress a smile. A polite sadist.

I did have a lighter. Never left home without one. But I didn't want to give him an excuse to fire up, fumigate our breathing space with raunchy Yunnan tobacco, and start yacking at me and further delay our departure for the first floor.

"No.” I lied. Pretending to rifle my pockets, I felt my lighter and moved on to jingle the change in my pocket. Fraudulently I said, "Sorry. No can do. I'm trying to give up the habit. Filthy stuff, tobacco."

He lowered the tilt of his head, the better to give me the evil eye. "Yeah, that explains the funny stuff you keep lighting up. There's only two sorts of stuff burning regularly up here on the rooftop. People barbequing and your wacky tobacky."

I ventured lamely, "Probably just burning some of the trash and leaves that collect on the roof."

"Inside your house?"

Then I remembered I wasn’t the only weed smoker in the building. Hardly. These mountains were polluted with users. "You've been snooping?” I asked confidently, “I thought your job was to run the elevator. Are you a snitch for the neighborhood committee?"

He gave me the evil eye, but the corners of his mouth drooped.

If people thought he was a snoop, they wouldn't talk to him any more. If I started a wicked rumor he couldn't be sure if folks in the building would ignore me because I was a dumb foreigner who didn't know anything or if they would believe every word I said because I was another Honest John of a foreigner who was too dumb to keep his mouth shut. The Cultural Revolution had demonstrated the danger of mixing dumbos and the truth: all hell could break loose.

I saw my opening, "OK then." I sniggered and then volleyed with: "First floor please!" And I stared at him hard, making my eyes large. He made a grouchy face, popped the key back into the slot, and away we went. He'd be polite to me from now on in. He wasn’t a bad guy anyway, just lonely sometimes.

Down on the street I grabbed some sourdough buns, some hot sauce and ginger slivers, plus some Moon Rabbit milk candies and that scrumptious Shanghai knock-off of Reese's peanut butter cups, not to mention a couple bottles of beer to gently wash it all down the gullet. I put my growing stash into my copious jacket pockets.

When I was done, and just about ready to grab a cab, I saw the neighborhood street person again. When he caught me looking at him, he stared. No hostility, just recognition, followed by shyness, and then a return to his monomania of prowling for cigarette butts. This time he was wearing green military pants with his grungy flipflops and faded Mao jacket. But when he moved now, he held his right hand out, his fingers extended, his palm aimed at the ground like those magnetic detectors people use looking for treasure buried in beaches. His hand was splayed. I cocked my head to get a better angle and realized that he was carrying it as if it was palsied. And his formerly normal walking pace was replaced with a 1-1-1-stop rhythm. 1-1-1-stop. 1-1-1-stop. This was how he got around now.

I was no stranger to superstition. He was developing a pantheon of taboos and inhibitions to improve his hunting of the ever more elusive cigarette butts; elusive because he'd found most of them by now and only a limited number were being flung from fingers to replenish the original yield. And so his superstition evolved to meet the challenge of changing conditions. No longer was he just crossing his fingers, he was moving onward and upward, evolving into a semi-paralytic. Soon he would reach climax and hardly be able to walk or move at all. Then the rubber truck would be called to take him to the loony bin, where it would take real magic to find any cigarette butts.

I turned back to the street and flagged down a cab to get to the stadium.

A screech caught my attention. I turned to see that yet another rural pedestrian (her knee stockings a dead giveaway), unused to the idea of two-way traffic and crosswalks, had jumped into the road like a springing deer and had almost been almost hit by a taxi. A shouting match ensued between the angry taxi driver and the frightened, embarrassedly defiant pedestrian, who kept her distance and then disappeared into the crowd on the other side of the road, interrupting traffic as she moved into the other lane, where she was met with honks and more jeering drivers.

I ignored the shouting match and hooted to the taxi driver, “Hey! Buddy! Can you take me to the soccer stadium?"

The driver looked over at me. He was still breathing rapidly and trying to keep his temper under control. He glared at me and then changed his mind. He sucked his teeth and said, "OK. Get in. Let's go."

As he got back in his vehicle he looked for the pedestrian, but she was long gone. He pulled his taxi up to the curb and I took a last turn around to see if street dude had struck gold. He was still in his stiff-legged gait, humping it the wrong way down the street. No cigarette butts in sight.

As I got in the taxi and parked my butt on the seat, the failing springs sank me nearly down to the level of my shoes. I looked on in mock horror as my knees came nearly up to my chest.

The driver thought I was looking for his pedestrian and started carrying on, “Fucking hayseed! That dumb bitch almost became roadkill. She might have damaged my car. A taxi's not cheap you know? I don't have any insurance. What would I do if my car was totaled? How would I support my family? How come these dimwits don't know how to cross a fucking street?"

I said," I'd like go to the soccer stadium, if you don't mind."

"Where?" barked the smoking driver through the bared teeth common to northern-accented Mandarin speakers.

"The soccer stadium."

"What for?" he laughed, scattering the spittle that collects at the edges of those bared teeth.

The car wasn't moving. Irritated I replied, “What difference does it make? For the soccer game. What else? Come on, let's get going. I don't want to be late."

"OK. Up to you." The beater began to move, the driver shifting gears at the lowest possible rpm to save gas. The whole chassis of the car shook terribly as a sympathetic vibration took hold. He didn't realize that his ultra low rpm gear-shifting would slowly warp the car's driveshaft and ruin it. There was music chirping through the car stereo. It was low but I could make it out: a Taiwanese sun-and-fun dirge, the type featuring a funeral organ, a three chord guitar rhythm, and a throaty female vocal with the powerful range required to hit the wailing notes of popular Japanese covers.

We passed a local park full of middle aged folks in track suits walking backwards to push the dharma wheel in reverse and collect retro chi. There were some oldsters looking like they were trying to shake off Parkinson's disease; no, scratch that, it was that tai chi warm-up for that looks like Holy Rollers getting the quakes as they let a/the Holy Spirit into their hearts.

The driver interrupted my day-dreaming to interject, "But the soccer game's on television. The scalpers can't even give away tickets."

As the car chugged down the street, I realized that I could stay at home, put my feet up, turn on the heater and roast my toes. I could enjoy myself with a beer, a clean toilet, a stocked fridge. It sounded great, but if I was at home, I wouldn't be able to suck in the stadium ambience, that friendly tippling and camaraderie of the home team crowd, the psychic lift my personal attendance and cheering would give the players. And this submersion in the partisan politics of sports is half of the game, isn't it? How can a livingroom TV compete?

My gaze out the car window fixed on something and my eyes came into focus on another taxi. This one was broken down. The angle of the front left wheel was splayed like a broken ankle with the foot pointing at an implausible angle. I leaned over the passenger seat to front and pointed across the road, asking the driver, "What happened to the car over there."

Squinting, the driver tried to be helpful and said, "Probably just defective. There's a lot of stolen cars on the roads. Shipped up from Hong Kong by speedboat into Guangzhou. You never know what you're buying."

But I scratched the afternoon growth on my chin and wondered if it wasn't just another new driver unfamiliar with his vehicle. Someone who didn't realize that purchasing a car was just the beginning of owning and operating a vehicle. Maintenance was required, such as lubing and changing the ball bearings on the axles. Otherwise the bearings gave out and the wheel came half off the strut.

The taxi driver prodded, "So you still want to go to the stadium?" Maybe he was hoping I would have a change of heart and opt for a cathouse on this chilly afternoon. Perhaps he hoped to negotiate a kickback when we arrived.

I took a moment to think about it. I sat back into the seat. Experimenting with how to be most comfortable, I ended up laying on it lengthwise. I chewed my lip and then decided, "Steady as she goes, captain. To the stadium."

"Have you been to the stadium before?"

"Of course"

"No. I mean, been to the stadium to watch a soccer came? Or something else, maybe?"

"No. I have to spend all of my time driving this taxi. I drive usually seven days a week and often 12 hours a day. I bet you white people don't work like this in America."

"Actually, a lot of people do, especially in industries that have seasonal highs and lows. I've done it. On a farm you usually harvest crops in the early fall and you're busier than hell. During the winter, there's nothing to do. I've worked 84 hours a week, just like you."

"Oh yeah?"

But I didn't want to discuss labor practices. "Anyway, you should check out the stadium sometime. For something to do."

"Yes. I suppose so."

The car suddenly veered to the left, there was an angry chorus of bicycle bells. The driver rushed to say, “Sorry about that. Another stolen manhole cover."

"Are they still stealing those things for scrap metal? Unbelievable."

"What do you mean? A lot of poor country people don't have jobs. The government is corrupt anyway. What's a few stolen manhole covers to the government boys. Most of the thieves leave a couple of plastic bottles in front so that you will know they've stolen the cover."

I relaxed some more into the seat, yawned and said, “I guess."

"The real problem with this town is the traffic." His voice had gone hoarse half way through that sentence. He started clearing his throat of a terrible luggee. After hacking and coughing like a cat with a fur ball in its throat, he expelled the whole awful mess, like a wad of chewing tobacco, out his open window. In China, the whole street was a spittoon. "Too many cars," he continued, "They should ban the bicycles from the main roads."

But it seemed to me that the real problem was driving skills. There was no concept of right-of-way. Driving down the street was a constant game of chicken. Just now, taking this right hand turn, the driver pretended not to see couple of pedestrians coming out into the street. I was looking right at them, while they were staring angrily him, the driver, trying to pierce his thick-skin with their psychic energy. By pretending not to see them, the driver didn't have to be polite and he could just ram right through.

But the stale air in the car was making me drowsy and dreamy. Maybe there was a leak in this beater that was letting in exhaust and carbon monoxide. I sure didn't want to fall asleep, so I rolled down my window a crack and started talking again. "Hey, do you know what the stadium reminds me of?"

"What?"

"It's like something right out of the Roman Empire."

"Huh? I doubt it." But actually, he hadn't even thought about it. What would he know about ancient Rome? About as much as I knew about ancient China. He simply disliked having a local icon compared to something predating it in the West. On the other hand, if the icon was Chinese and came first, that was okay.

"No. Seriously. The Roman Empire was just another socialist state full of dissidents, slaves, make-work projects, fiat government, patriotism and imperialism."

"Imperialism? That's what the Western nations did to us."

I was in too good a mood to argue with him. "The Roman's probably had great food too. Almost as good as Chinese food." I was trying to be a smart ass, although this was lost on the driver. Which was all the better anyway when I realized that Chinese food probably was a lot better than Roman food.

"Did you know the Roman's killed Jesus?"

"Fucking imperialists." The driver growled. "They always kill the good guys."

His taxi was littered with Buddhist paraphernalia and Daoist mojo. Gold, crimson, black, and saffron statues of dark gods and happy Buddhas were stuck on the dashboard; fetishes dangled from his rear-view mirror, their tassels swinging as the car bumped down the road and jerked during gear shifts.

I wondered how to put what I wanted to say into perspective. "Yeah. That would be sort of like Mao Tze-dung putting a bullet in the back of Sun Yat-sen's neck. You know, killing the nation's founding father. The good guy"

"What do you mean?" he asked, his eyes staring at me suspiciously from the rear-view mirror.

"Sorry about that. I mean... It would be like Chiang Kai-shek putting a bullet in the back of his neck."

"Yeah?"

"Sure. You know. Bad guys killing good guys. Just like in the movies."

"Uh-huh."

"Well, what I mean is that, Chinese Jesus's are still getting it in the neck here all the time. In the stadium I mean. They haul them out, read out their crimes, and put a bullet in them. No joke."

"You against capital punishment? Not us Chinese. When your time's up, it's up."

I wasn't sure what this meant. I wanted to talk about dissidents, he wanted to discuss the death penalty. Was this an evasion? But just in case he was serious I said, "That's sort of like what some Christians say in America. When your time's up, it's because you're wanted in heaven."

"Huh." I couldn't tell if he was suspicious, indifferent, bored, or wanted to drop the subject. Maybe I was crazy, high, or a snoop.

I abandoned the effort. We were soon at my destination and I paid the fare.

I looked up the bright and shiny white entrance to the stadium. I was impressed that the old gray dilapidated face, with its missing shards of plaster revealing exposed brick masonry, had been revamped and repainted. Now it looked much more like a going concern. The last time I'd been here, there were a handful of twenty-foot tall hardwood trees growing right out of the walls. Seeds had been blown up by the wind into seams in the concrete, germinated, and grown. And grown and grown. That was all history now. Socialism had been replaced by professionalism.

When I went inside, the ticket lady was still a troll, but a younger and prettier one in a proper uniform. She demanded money from me like a gangster and literally threw my ticket at me. But I was used to that. Progress was being made. One step at a time.

I was further impressed to find that they had installed an elevator. Formerly, you had to walk all the way up and down the bleachers, huffing and puffing and ready for the showers by the time you got to your seat. You watched the summer games all sticky and grimy. In the winter games, once you stopped sweating, you were still wet and clammy under your clothes and at risk for getting a chill. That was all history now too.

When the elevator doors opened, I saw the obligatory elevator operator hired for the public's convenience. As I got in with the overeager crowd, I felt elbows sticking in my kidneys, my shoes getting scuffed, my feet getting squashed. The operator was indifferent to the happy squirming commotion, the tipsy men exchanging sports lore, the muffled complaining of a toothsome girl who was accusing someone of anonymously pinching her bum, the male laughter which met her complaint. The operator was sound asleep on a cot that he had moved into the elevator. He was under a blanket and covered from head to toe. Only the outline of his body and snoring gave him away. Like many people in China who held two jobs, he had wisely selected one of the positions specifically for the opportunity to sleep on the job.

As the elevator went up, the air took on a strong fragrance of sausage and garlic. First I breathed shallowly and then I tried to hold my breath. But as the doors opened, the crowd pushed out and I gasped as I was lifted right off my feet for a couple of seconds by the rush. As my feet touched down again I breathed deep gouts of fresh air.

I checked my ticket and looked for the approximate area in which I was supposed to sit. This being China, the seat number was more like a suggestion. Outside of the VIP area, it was finder’s keepers free-for-all.

Looking out onto the soccer pitch, the teams were warming up. Players were kicking the ball to and fro, doing short sprints; the goalkeepers were stretching like yoga masters.

Today's soccer match was between the local boys and Hong Kong University. I didn't gamble, but if I did, I'd bet on the HK team. Now that I thought about it, I wanted to watch the poor suffering ex-colonials from HK, seduced by Western capitalist brainwashing into sucking-up to the evil boots of the British ex-tyranny, go on to kick the asses of the patriotic and chemically-pure home team.

The nosy neighbors at the apartment had made me irritable again. Or was it that I was antsy and spiteful at the prospect of going back to school. What if I made a mess of things? I tried not to think about it.

I found my appointed bleacher location and took a look around to see if there was anything better. Nah, this spot was fine actually. I took a look around before I sat down. It seemed pretty average crowd. I didn't come very often, but every time I did, you could tell that local people were increasingly prosperous and the standard of living was steadily rising.

For example, that woman over there: the one with the bongo lips, and the clam shaped mouth which is often symptomatic of childhood calcium deficiency. See the small teeth? Yup. Calcium. Anyway, she's got that pink watch, with the flesh wristband, blue jeans, and robin eggshell blue pumps. But the hairstyle is lagging behind the times right? She's got a coiffeur that reminds you of The Ramones. Still, on the positive side, she's got a bit of makeup which seems to work and isn't too obvious from a distance.

Or take that other one, that cutie over there on the right, with the broad forehead. She looks vaguely like a buffalo because of that hairstyle: long and parted directly down the middle, and then scraped down the side of her temples and looks like curtains. But she's Japanese clean and has delicate skin. A sweet young thing. Easy take home material.

And then there's that middle-aged woman up here on my right. She's tinted her hair a rust-purple. With the today's wind messing it up, it looks almost like a rug, though I'm sure it's actually natural. That thin sweater she's wearing, it's definitely made out of artificial ingredients and the geometric pattern enables it to substitute for a chessboard if need be. And she's wearing the popular long pointy shoes that fit on women's feet like canoes or kayaks. Perhaps she's a divorcee.

You probably think I'm mocking these good folks. I'm not. All around me, I see serious progress. The clothes are clean, pressed, adventurous, less tacky; the attitudes are more relaxed, confident, less xenophobic, willing to get down with foreigners.

And take a look at that one. That nervous energy, the thin pipe-cleaner limbs, the self-absorption and indifference to people around her. She's busy flipping through page after page of her newspaper. This is still a rare bird for these parts, though there's more in the pipeline I'm sure. The no-nonsense blue jeans, the unadorned black turtleneck, the black rimmed glasses without the flapping price tag. She's probably a lawyer or an information worker of some kind, maybe a reporter. Either way she's whole-hog middle class.

These other women are dressing to be noticed, to make an overt statement; they're looking for recognition and other forms of feedback. What a brilliant improvement over submerging oneself in the masses! But this other one lets her clothes do all the communicating for her. She's not interested in confirmation. Her elegance is more like a warning to those without both feet planted solidly in the middle-class. Do not disturb! Keep out! Shove off!

She was a bit older too. In her thirties. I was wondering if I could get up the nerve to introduce myself and talk to her, when suddenly felt this tap on my right shoulder blade.

“Are you reading that?” asked a Chinese woman of about 30, judging by the depth of the three lines circling her neck and the way the muscle rippled under the corners of her mouth. She was red-faced and her breath had the faint smell of alcohol. Make that fragrance. It was appealing. Alcohol and attractive women, as a combination, often are.

She was referring to the game schedule I was holding in my hand. It was in Chinese. I replied, “I was a minute ago. Just looking to see when the game's going to break up for half-time so I know when to..."

She cut me off. "You can read Chinese?"

I hesitated for a second over whether I should pretend to be Chinese. I decided that today I'd be a foreigner. I replied to her in the affirmative to which she said, "Can you speak Chinese?"

She was serious. "Yes, in fact, believe it or not, I'm speaking to you right now in Chinese." And I gave her a smile and deadpan eyes.

"You're fantastic! That's amazing. I wouldn't believe it if I hadn't seen it with my own two eyes. You must have Chinese blood in you. Your dark hair. That's it. Your mother is Chinese?"

"Actually, I'm pure Caucasian. If there is such a thing as a pure ethnic background, that is." I chortled semi-sincerely.

She frowned, moved down to my bench to get close to me. She was in a carmine satin jacket tastefully littered with the Chinese character for prosperity and curry-brown slacks. The lazy scuffing of her feet on the bleachers brought my attention to the patent leather shoes she was wearing. There was a minimum of leather to maximize the amount of skin revealed. The small heels gave her booty a delicate lift.

She approached and put her hand right on my face, moving my chin forcefully, back-and-forth, wagging it and giving me the appearance of expressing NO!

She pulled back from me again, looked me over, stared me in the eye and stated, "No, you're definitely Chinese somehow. That explains it. Foreigners can't speak Chinese very well. And they never master it. It's too difficult. It's a Chinese language." She shrugged, stating what she considered to be obvious, "It's for the Chinese."

I didn't know what to say. I was taken aback by her forcefulness. Sure, she'd been drinking. But maybe she was a lunatic? I'd heard such sentiments from other people before. I was more than familiar with the logic. But the fact that she was touching me in public was unusual. People went to jail for doing precisely this, the local police framing them on suspicion of prostitution or some other such nonsense charge.

"So, I'm curious. Who in your family is Chinese?"

I laughed the nervous chuckle off someone trying to advance an unpopular idea. "I'm quite serious. Actually, there is no Chinese blood in my veins."

This wasn't what she wanted to hear. Her face went redder than it already was. She got up in a huff and left. I groaned, realizing how much en masse admitted the situation. If I played my cards right, perhaps I could arranged an extramarital fling. Instead, yet again my pathological mania for honesty was getting in the way. The road to Chinese hell was being paved with my good intentions.

I knew fully well that once you start speaking Mandarin, even if you're dressed up to the nines in foreigner gear and have blue eyes and blond hair, people presume you have Chinese blood. It often takes a heroic effort to persuade people that you aren't at least part Chinese. At that point, protesting that you're not Chinese even somehow becomes unpatriotic. An affront to the Chinese people. They're offering membership in the Chinese clan. Why don't you want it? We're not good enough for you?

For trying to tell the truth you become a no good big-nose bastard. Recently my wife had been nagging, "Lie Charlie. It's easier." She'd wink and I'd feel guilty and foolish and be persuaded to move another inch towards her values, her family's values, the city's values, the region's values, the province's values, the national values. So much for my values.


Insert gay dude trying to pick you up...







I turned around to hear a slurred, "Yo, dude, wazzup?"

It was a thin, balding American-sounding guy with a peaked nose and a pizza face. He was dressed in the local Army fatigues. I hadn't seen this sort of thing before on a foreigner. I thought you might get arrested. Goes to show you how much more civilized and cosmopolitan things are getting to be. The only stuff missing from his brash outfit was the cap and epaulets. He even had chevrons and shit-kicker boots.

I replied, "So, how to do you do? I guess you're a soccer fan, eh?"

"Yeah, of course. There's not much other reason to come to these stands on a cold blustery day. Why don't you sit up here with me? The view's better. We can check out the game together. Exchange complaints. Whaddaya say?"

I stuffed my steamed buns and beer back into my jacket, got up and while I stepped up and over to the next level of bleachers, I asked "So, what's your name and where are you from?"

"What are you, a snoop?"

"Get real. I'm just here to watch the game. Don't be paranoid. That's the local's job."

He snickered but was chagrined, "Right, right. I was just messing with you, to see what you'd say." As I sat down, he took his eyes off my gaze and regrouped and said, "You know, people are always asking you where you're from, what your name is, what you do. It gets to be a pain in the ass. You get the urge to start telling people you're Bongo Nuts, from Buttfuck, US of A."

"Yeah, that's true. Sorry. I didn't mean to pry. But, I guess I'm still kind of curious. My name is Charles Ferguson. You may call me Charlie." I extended my hand.

"I MAY call you Charlie? What're you, Little Lord Fauntleroy?"

"Hey, cut it out!"

"May? What are you? A Brit?" He jerked back as if hit with a nasty smell. Narrowing his eyes he said, "You look American." Now he was indignant, as if I'd played him for a fool.

"American?" I looked down, "Jeez! Yeah, I'm an American! We're all Americans right? Now you sound just like the Chinese."

"Watch it! Them's fighting words." He'd raised his fists in a boxing stance, but he was smiling, just teasing. "So whaddaya do here Charlie. If I may pry."

"Nobody says, 'if I may pry'. It's either 'if I may' or...ah... 'I don't mean to pry.'" On saying this I felt better, but began to wonder if he hadn't deliberately botched the phrase to give me the chance to regain face. "Anyway, I'm Canadian. And I'm in between jobs. Used to be an English teacher, but now I'm starting grad school."

"Grad school, you're putting me on? You don't mean here in this dirt bag town, do you?"

"Umm, yeah, actually I do. I'm starting the Masters program in history just next week as a matter of fact."

"Well fuck me, man! That's too cool. We must be in the same ass program."

"No way! Right on! So what brings you here to the university?"

"A scholarship. What else would attract me to this jerk-water paradise? Freshwater schools don't exactly enjoy a great reputation on this planet."

It always bothered me when somebody started taking cheap shots at China and the Chinese. It wasn't their fault. Chinese chauvinism was expected, but it looked ugly on a foreigner. I know it must sound sort of hypocritical of me carrying on like this, but only if you think my shots are cheap shots too. I don't know, somehow when I'm critical it doesn't sound cheap at the time. Later, however… Either way, it's usually not fair no matter who does it. So even if I can't manage my own mouth, I can help others. You know. Be a good Samaritan. Do a good deed every day. Give back to society. And Chinese society has been very good to me -- my griping to the contrary -- when all is said and done. So I said, "That's not very nice, especially when they're giving you a scholarship, right?"

"Well you're a cheap whore. All it takes is a scholarship to zip up your mouth. Damn, dude, try working up some independence of spirit. Buy back your own soul. I can understand poor people selling out, but you aren't poor. Or if you are, no foreigner has to be impoverished in this country. Once you fall off the boat, as long as you've got a pulse, you've got it made."

I interrupted, "Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I know the deal, I've been talking and writing about this for a dog's age. Nothing new under the sun."

“You write? No shit? Fiction? Non-fiction?”

Being around him made me self-conscious. “Just a blog. Nothing special. Short stories and stuff. It's embarrassing. You'd hate it.”

“I should check it out. A writer in training wheels. I respect that.”

I didn't believe him. Everything he said was tainted with mockery. To change the subject I asked, "So what is it that you're going to study, anyway?" But I already knew it had to be interesting, unconventional, whatever it was. An antidote to the dreary moth-infested two years that otherwise potentially lay ahead.

"I believe you mean 'what is it that I'm going to research?' I'm not just sure yet. Probably something like anticolonialism."

"Anticolonialism? What's that?"

"When's the last time you were in school, dude? Don't bother answering that." He paused and sighed with resignation. He hesitated and decided to go through with what he was going to say, "I'm interested in a lot of the bullshit arguments opposing colonialism. Or, for example, just look at the problems that have arisen in the 20th century because of the popularity of political self-determination. Pundits and hacks are always going on about the importance of it, but it seems to me to cause more trouble than it's worth: civil wars, guerrilla insurgencies, nationalism and flag-waving patriotism. It's just another example of idealism and of what H.L. Mencken was talking about when he wrote about the US Civil War and said in passing that a moral victory is always a disaster."

"Wow!” I hesitated, fumbling for the right spoken word, not my forte, “That's a pretty weird take on things."

But I was interested. And becoming increasingly interested in him. He was a prick, but a sharp, bright, ruthless one. People who berated others, when they themselves couldn't or weren't interested in doing what the other did, were dime a dozen. Setting straw men alight took no bravery, just a lazy frame of mind and five minutes initiation to begin a lifetime of turning this trick. But he was happy to berate himself and his own country. Everything was a potential target. Whatever he was going to do would be exciting. And probably self-destructive. I wanted to be there, to watch.

He frowned and asked, "You ever heard of this guy?" He pulled a book out of his satchel. The cover said, The Antichrist. "You know this dude, right?"

I replied, "Yeah, of course. Everyone knows him. He's that 19th-century philosopher Nietsky."

"For the love of... It's pronounced Neechee. Not fuckin Nietsky. God, it's going to be a tough semester." He shook his head.

"Awe, come on. Don't give me such a hard time. I know this guy, I just don't know how to pronounce his name. I mean, it's not like my Chinese wife is going to tell me how to say it. And back at home, the only German prodigy that local folks would know would be...umm... Arnold Schwarzenegger?"

He started chuckling, "He's not even German. He's Austrian."

"Yeah…but…uh…he's ethnically German, just born in Austria, right? Let's split the difference and call it even."

"If you say so." He rolled his eyes. "Read this section okay. Nietsky put it better than I ever will."

"Quit it!"

"Read. Please?"

I find the arrogant habit of the theologian among all who regard themselves as "idealists"--among all who, by virtue of a higher point of departure, claim a right to rise above reality, and to look upon it with suspicion. . . The idealist, like the ecclesiastic, carries all sorts of lofty concepts in his hand (--and not only in his hand!); he launches them with benevolent contempt against "understanding," "the senses," "honor," "good living," "science"; he sees such things as beneath him, as pernicious and seductive forces, on which "the soul" soars as a pure thing-in-itself--as if humility, chastity, poverty, in a word, holiness, had not already done much more damage to life than all imaginable horrors and vices. . .

When I finished, I said, "Huh!" and looked at him wondering what he expected me to say.

"Idealism's a big problem dude. And not just in the academy. Look at war in the 20th century. I mean, if you're a weaker country and just lay down and take it when a stronger power comes along, most of these dumb ass wars would never take place. I mean, look at the French in the Second World War. They just bent over and took it in the kazoo for six years. You know, Vichy France? Paris remained intact. That was the way to do it."

"Yeah, but didn't they roundup the Jews and ship them off to concentrations camps and kill them?"

"And that wouldn't have happened if the Germans had blasted their way through?"

"Yeah but it would have given the Jews more time to escape."

"Escape to where? Nobody wanted them in those days."

"Okay, well, I don't know much about Europe." I shrugged.

"Then look at China. When the Japs came blasting through, Chiang Kai-shek wanted to just let them come into Shanghai and take what they wanted. He knew he couldn't stop them. He was right. But some of the more patriotic idealists and dreamy socialists got together and decided to make a last stand in Shanghai. The result was a lot of dead people and a lot of smashed real estate and they still lost Shanghai. An ancillary result of that was the Nanjing massacre. If they hadn't defended Shanghai, the Japs wouldn't have gone into Nanjing and started shooting civilians. The Japs took a real beating in Shanghai from snipers and so they killed every soldier they found in Nanjing, whether armed or in civilian attire."

"That's still a war crime! You can't just kill soldiers. You put 'em in a POW camp. When the war's over, you release them."

"Calm down! Calm down! It's not even your war. I hate it when foreigners become patriots of their adopted countries. Such patronizing. Such piety. The world needs to be saved from nuts like you." He rolled his eyes again and waved me down. "Stop for a minute! … Hey! There it is again. I keep smelling something organic and ripe. You farting or are you hiding food in your jacket?" He looked at me with confidence, a greedy smile forming on his lips. Daring me to be so weak and insecure as to deny him some grub. The slippery devil. It felt like being worked over by a hostess in a cathouse.

I said, "Oh yeah? Well I can't imagine anything I'd eat would be up to your uppity standards."

"Try me. C'mon. You can do it." He extended his left hand in front of me to distract me from his other hand which snatched my sourdough buns out from my jacket pocket.

"Son of a bitch! Give those back."

"Take a Prozac will ya! I'll pay my share, don't worry about it. You need to cut some weight anyway. What about drinks? What are we sucking back today?"

"You wish."

"I got to sing for my supper? Can do. Okay. As to your war-crime, of course it's a crime against humanity. But so are ultraviolet rays. So what do you suggest should be done? Should those dirt-bags at the United Nations pass a binding resolution condemning the sun and impose sanctions? You can spout all the rhetoric you want. But what difference will it make? What matters is what you're going to do about it. And ethics? That's a bit rich during wartime, don't you think? It's fine and dandy during peacetime to talk about the ethics of the battlefield or elsewhere. But the reality is that people do what they do when you give them weapons and hate. Or should I say, weapons and idealism, which is what the Axis powers were really about. Not to mention al Qaeda. War on Terror? It ought to be called War on Idealism."

"What's that supposed to mean?"

And then we were both cut off by an enourmous roar from the crowd.

"What happened?" I looked on to the soccer pitch and saw a goalkeeper pulling the ball out of the corner of his net. The Hong Kong quislings had scored against the local patriots. But the roar only subsided into a cacophony of howls, whistles, and boos. It kept going and a crazy disjointed wave began circling the stadium. It went around once, and then came back around in our direction again. Pizza face stood up and grabbed me by the collar, pulling me up to my feet.

"Oy!" I protested.

Then he looked at me very seriously and with the tone of warning said, "Charlie! Stand the fuck up or we're going to get thrown out of the bleachers by some group of maniacs."

The wave passed through us and we sat down again. I asked, "Hey, so what's your name anyway?"

"Bartholomew Matthew Spencer. When I was a kid, people called me Bart. As you can imagine that's not such a cool nickname anymore. Call me Matt or Matthew, as you like. Anyway, here," and he shoved my steamed buns back at me quickly. "Put this food back in your pockets, dude. Hide it."

"Huh?" But I did as I was told and began to have an inkling why. For out of the corner of my eye I saw a first pair of gray fluttering things go by. I thought they were pigeons scoping for French fries or other bleacher foodstuffs at first, but when I focused I realized it was actually two fluttering plastic bags with stuff inside. I followed their trajectory as they plummeted to the bottom of the stands to their appointed target: a gaggle of green-suited police. Some were still anxiously putting on their helmets; the chief upfront was yammering orders sharply to get his men to place their riot shields above them. A genuine phalanx.

Following the initiative shown by the first scofflaws, the rest of the crowd erupted. It was like half a food fight, the sort I'd witnessed in high school cafeterias. Everything became fair game as a weapon: bags of noodles, soup, buns, bean milk, chopsticks, and cartons, whatever. This raid, this artillery barrage of breakfasts and lunches launched by the great proletariat, came flying down the bleachers at the police below. The crowd shrieked and howled, people were really excited. It was Tiananmen in 1989 all over again. Like a positive version of the Cultural Revolution, a free-for-all by the downtrodden to stand authority on its ear.

All around us were jabbering men who'd been hitting the sauce, now smiling and gesticulating, pumped with liquid courage and having a great time getting revenge on the anonymous baddies who were the police. With excuse of losing a goal to the quislings, everyone could obliquely express their dissatisfaction with the political status quo. Each profited from the anonymity of being just another black-top in the crowd. Power to the people!

But that wasn't all there was to this. "So, have you seen this kind of thing before?" Knowing that, by virtue of his reaction, he must have.

"Yeah, of course. It's sort of de rigueur at games nowadays. The home team gets scored on and the protest food starts flying. I don't know. What do you expect from these monkeys?"

"Monkeys?" I was shocked. "Isn't that racist?"

"Racist? What do you mean? I don't believe in the concept of race. Sure, they're different colors of skin, but I don't see any difference in terms of intelligence. I thought you're Canadian? Surely you of all people, growing up in a country that prides itself on multiculturalism, should know that racism is bullshit."

"Yeah, but..."

"So if I call a white dude a monkey, would that NOT be racism? Is that it?" He frowned and looked away into the flying food, irritated. Just in time to see a plastic sports-drink bottle that was coming right for my noggin and snag it gracefully with one hand out of the chilly air.

"Jeez! Great catch. Thanks. That one would have hurt." And then I wondered out loud, "Do you think it was deliberately aimed at us?"

He was keeping an eye out now to rear as he marched me forward. "These mofos are spastic to beat the band." More racism, I thought.

He must have known what I was thinking because he picked up his explanation where he left off, "You know, I get the feeling that nine times out of ten, people who play the race card do so because they actually believe in congenital racial inequality. They get so worked up because they really believe there is a difference. Not me, pal. So, if we're going to be cool, ditch the race card. Besides, racism was never about race even to begin with. It was always about culture. Who's on top and who's below simply depends on the strength of the economy of that culture. That's pretty much what defines where you on are the totem pole, who you are in the food chain: doing the eating or being eaten."

"Yeah, I guess... I don't know. I mean..."

"We can talk about this shit later. C'mon."

Whether I agreed with him or not, I loved listening to someone else try to make sense out of the world. What a nutty perspective he had. And all those historical references. Attending a local university, I figured I could just fake my knowledge of Western history. The profs wouldn't know too much, I figured. And they'd be insecure about what they did know because they couldn't freely access information in the West.

"Charlie, haul that fat ass of yours. We've got to keep moving." I had sat down to listen but Matt pulled me to my feet again and we started to edge our way along the bleachers, "Look around you. We're still in the middle of the crowd that's tossing the food. If the cops change their mind and get feisty, they're gonna start shooting in our direction. If we're luck it's gas. If we're not, it's bullets. This country had 57,000 recorded mass protests last year. I don't feel like being confused for no string-pulling, rabble-rousing monkey and taking a bullet. I'm not going to be a fucking martyr for a cause that I don't believe in."

People heard us speaking English and turned to stare. Even people who didn't speak a lick of English recognized Matt's four-letter adjectives and his pejorative tone of voice. Some folks were friendly, others indifferent, some hostile, perhaps suspecting we were snoops or even provocateurs. A time like this made folks receptive to imaginative conspiracy scenarios.

A few wrong words and inappropriate body language and we might get lynched. The cops couldn't protect us now and neither could anyone else. We'd be like those poor Japanese tourists in Guatemala who were pulled out of a tour bus and strung up in a mountain village a couple of years ago. Some ambitious local sorcerer convinced people that Jap bodies were inhabited by evil spirits. Civilization is a thin veneer on society, etc... Truer words never spoken, baby.

I heard a squawk below, and, peering between the standing spectators, I was able to see a middle-aged female food vendor engaged in a tug-of-war with three men. They were taking her mantou buns and throwing them at the police. The crowd around her was cheering. Matthew said, "There you go. That's the real heart of this protest. Middle-aged adults who never had the chance to engage in vandalism as kids, are now getting their kicks and loving it."

"You mean, they never got it out of the system when they were younger?"

"That's the key to Cultural Revolution, if you ask me. Mao just pushed the button, but the machinery was already there, ready-made, primed and ready to go."

"Okay, but don't you think that there's something noble about this protest? I mean, it's good to see the police get their asses kicked sometimes, don't you think? They're famous for being brutal."

"That may be, but they're just schleppes doing their job. They got families and kids to feed, like everyone else. They take orders most of the time, not give them. Besides, if you don't protect private property, you ain't got nothing in this world. The basis of civilization is private property. It must be protected. Bad cops notwithstanding."

Not knowing what to say, not having any ideas on the subject, I tried to be clever and said, "But what about freedom of speech? That's surely the most important thing in our culture."

"Nope. Protecting private property comes first. Only with private property do you have free speech. Without property, you don't have rights. Rights have to be earned, fought for, negotiated. No one has an intrinsic right to rights. You need to read Thucydides."

I knew who this was but didn't dare ask which part of his book I was supposed to read. Interpreting my silence as ignorance, he turned and shouted, "The Melian Debate."

But he wasn't angry now. Perhaps having someone to talk to was softening his rancor at a world that surely ignored him most of the time.

He kept yanking on my arm, pulling me through the bleachers until we got several rows over where the population was thinner. Well and not so well-dressed couples had come over here to canoodle. They were in various stages of amorous adventure and needed greater space to stretch their legs to facilitate getting the petting action going. There was a layer of voyeurs in the bleachers immediately above; unlucky at love, they gaped. One took notes. Several of the citizenry were playing pocket pool. One gentleman, perhaps deranged, was harmlessly pulling on his pecker. It was just another Saturday afternoon in the boondocks.

As to Matt and me, we were just happy to have immediate access to an exit. An emergency escape.

We sat down. He ignored the continuing commotion and continued, "Greed is the best thing we human beings have going for us. It's steady, reliable, predictable. With private property and greed, the Greeks and Romans established the fabulous inequalities of wealth which were needed to fund their great civilizations. When Christianity became the religion of the Roman Empire in 310 AD, it was all downhill till civilization finally bottomed out at the level playing field and imploded like paper mache in the rain. Once greed became verboten, the only thing left was fairness and equality. And with that, Christian mobs burned every library on the theory that books were unfair to the illiterate, killed every smarty on the theory that smart people were unfair to the dumb, and closed the public baths on the theory that being clean was unfair to the great unwashed."

Did he really believe that? He nodded to me, saying, "And that led directly to the Dark Ages, to Napoleon, the USSR, South African apartheid, Hitler and the Nazis, Pol Pot, North Korea, and Communist China. Fairness has an impressive history of death-dealing and destruction. As does pity. But that's another story for another time."

"Yeah?"

"Yeah." Having got this off his chest, he chilled out, got smiley and became aware of his appetite. "Hey, how about that food in your pockets? I've earned it haven't I? Thinking makes me hungry. Don't be so cheap."

That seemed to be his cornerstone strategy: making you feel petty and allowing you back into his good graces if you did him a good turn. The good turn he dictated to you, that is.

Greed. Quid pro quo. This really seemed to be his operating philosophy. He wasn't kidding.

But just as I was rifling my pockets, another roar went up. But it was quickly followed by silence. A thin reedy voice wavered across our part of the stadium. I couldn't make out what it was saying. He looked like a farmer, judging by the billowing crazy hair, the sandals, the Mao jacket and fluffy pants. It was only in the hinterlands, the really conservative areas, where people didn't really believe that Mao was finally gone, that his spirit or scion wouldn't suddenly reappear to start a whole new decade of dunce caps, airplanes, Gulags, and firing squads, that people still wore this stuff.

Farmers had become a cause celebre and they were always in the news. They were still suffering, the economy not having picked up in the remote areas (as opposed to the areas close to the cities, where some farmers were doing gangbusters). Transportation links hadn't been set up. In lieu of half an hour by superhighway, peasants might need four to eight hours of rural byway to travel the same distance. I suspected Matt would have said something along the lines of rural greed hadn't met up with city greed, shaken hands and got down to some mutually advantageous profiteering.

That was his shtick. He was consistently dramatic, trying to get your attention and push your buttons. He laid a trap and if you fell into it, weakened and vulnerable, he defied you to cross swords with him and pushed the point home when he could.

I recognized this in him like one drunk spotting another in a room. His shtick was my shtick. My choice of the word 'shtick' was a giveaway in itself. It was false, insincere, a trying-too-hard. It was an attempt to weaken Matt's strength through spin. It was my flair, my extravagant attempt to make up for my weakness, real or perceived. But this admission only strengthened me. Having opened the septic wound, it was now ready for cleaning. Would Matt do the same?

Seeing the farmer up at the top of the bleachers, next to the edge of the stadium, making a speech, was ominous. Everyone knew what this portended. A last stand.

I heard marching coming up from below and peered around the lip of the exit to see the phalanx of police hotfooting up the bleachers. But the farmer was prepared; they usually are. He pulled out a bottle, gasoline no doubt, and poured it on himself. Everyone was quiet. Just the sound of marching and the police chief exhorting his men, like a sports team coach, to seize the farmer.

For the rest of us, the crowd included, it was like witnessing a saint. A martyr. So quiet. Steadfast. So this was what it looked like. What it felt like.

He said nothing, then a last shouted burst of "China! Ten thousand years! Ten thousand years! Ten thousand years and no justice for the people of China." And then he pulled out a huge lighter. I couldn't see it clearly, but it must have been one of those Chairman Mao blowtorch models which plays "The Sun Sets in the West over China." He set his jacket alight, the wind in the upper bleachers rapidly transforming him into a human torch. A couple of women screamed, but the mood was respect. Quiet respect and the steadily approaching trump-trump-trump of police quickstepping up the bleachers.

It sounds morbid, but I wanted to watch so badly. I was transfixed. Gaping. Almost insensate. Yet tears were streaming down my face. It was 1989 all over again.

Matt yanked me harshly, and shouted, "Let's get the fuck out of here! I mean now goddamit!"

Unfinished - Copyright Biff Cappuccino

worker douses himself with gasoline, followed by spontaneous eruption of falungong people.

Get hauled off to jail.

Don't forget to have him discuss Philippine landslides, China and Wal-Mart. He pulls apart that book by Jan Wong (Iris Chang comes later. You post an essay which is just your blog rant),

Ask Frankie (change from 'Frank' to 'Frankie') to get you out by bringing ID. He gets beat up by cops who think he's black. He's actually a very dark Tamil Sri Lankan.

Copyright Biff Cappuccino

Thursday, December 02, 2004

More comedy. Christ! Everywhere I turn, it's hustlers peddling bogus history. Check out this sweetheart: Norma Khouri.
-
-
From The Victims of ‘Victimhood’ :
-
Norma Khouri’s international best-seller “Honor Lost: Love and Death in Modern-Day Jordan” is an indictment of “honor killings”: the practice of killing women whose behavior has shamed the family. Khouri’s lifelong friend Dalia, a Jordanian Muslim, was murdered in Amman by her father for falling in love with a Christian.
-
Fearing for her life, Khouri fled Jordan to asylum in Australia. The sensation caused by the book is flawed by one thing—the story may be a lie from beginning to end.
-
An 18-month investigation of “Honor Lost” (titled “Forbidden Love” outside the U.S.) was conducted by the Australian Sydney Morning Herald and Amal Sabbagh—the Secretary-General of the Jordanian National Commission for Women.
-
On July 14, the resulting expose rocked the literary world.
Khouri’s book is riddled with factual errors as well as what Sabbagh called a general “lack of knowledge of Islam and of Jordan.” For example, the book refers to Kuwait as Jordan’s neighbor when the two countries share no border. It describes the Jordan River flowing through the capital of Amman when no such tributary exists. These are strange errors from someone who hails from Amman.
-
More damning was the revelation that Khouri had left Jordan at the age of three and lived in Chicago for almost 30 years.
Lying for fame and fortune is nothing new. The intriguing aspect is how our society has become so gullible as to gulp down claims of victimhood without pausing for evidence.
-
From Chicago police reopen file on Norma Khouri :
-
AMMAN — The Sydney Morning Herald reported on Saturday that Jordanian author Norma Khouri had allegedly defrauded close friends, family and the sick of around $1 million over “the best part of 10 years.”
The Herald's Chicago correspondent Caroline Overington said 34-year-old Khouri has been on the run from the Chicago police and the FBI for more than five years.
-
Now, following the Herald's investigation of her literary hoax, the police have reopened a metre-thick file on the author — known in the US as Norma Toliopoulos — with the aim of charging her with a decade's worth of crime, Overington wrote.
-
“We believe she is a con woman,” a source within the Chicago Police Department told the Herald, “one of the best we've ever seen.”
Khouri has allegedly netted at least $1 million from her crime, according to the Herald.
-
Chicago police were about to issue a warrant for her arrest in 1999 but she took flight, eventually resurfacing in Australia as the best-selling author of the supposed memoir Forbidden Love, the newspaper said.
-
Documents obtained by the Herald show that in 1996, Khouri took 97 US government bonds worth $408,000 from a safety deposit box owned by her elderly neighbour, Mary Baravikas. Police believe that she also stole Baravikas' house and $33,000 in cash that was also in the deposit box, according to the Herald.
-
Khouri has also been accused of taking $40,000 from a man who claims he was her lover. According to documents obtained by the Herald, a man called John Closterides told Chicago police in 1999 that he had a “romance” with Norma Khouri. She told him she was a Jordanian princess, the Herald said.
-
From Betrayal but a small part of the larger deception :
-
When I wrote my novel Somewhere, Home, based on my grandmother's life, I realised that in spite of all the difficulties she faced, and at a very young age, she never felt sorry for herself. She chose instead to be resourceful, to make a new life in her adopted home and with her adopted family. While my book fictionalised events, I hoped I had conveyed a real sense of her feistiness and of her strength of spirit, the way she had succeeded in looking beyond her own traditional upbringing. I wanted the book to be in that sense truthful.
AdvertisementAdvertisement
-
Which is one of the reasons I was so upset by Norma Khouri's Forbidden Love, the "memoir" about a Jordanian honour killing which was withdrawn by its Australian publisher after being exposed by the Herald as a fraud. The book, published in 2002, became a bestseller in the US and was sold to publishers around the world; in Australia it sold more than 200,000 copies.
-
-
To cop a phrase from Burgess's A Clockwork Orange, these people give me a royal pain in the gulliver. Watching this silliness seems to help:
http://www.craptv.com/coop/america.htm
-
Biff Cappuccino

Today's www.atol.com forum posts:
-
Other dude: Pepe Escobar is my most favourite writer bar none. I have quite a few favs but no one holds a candle to pepe. Just wanted to say what a great writer he is. Although in quite a few respects he is a bit ahead of the times.
-
Biff: Pepe Escobar is just another conspiracy theorist. There is nothing too improbable, as long as it's politically correct, that he won't swallow and parrot. He strikes me as just another journalist who values safety in numbers. Does he ever do his homework on the issues? Does he ever read a book? He strikes me as being completely inert and incapable of thinking for himself. He has never displayed an original thought in any of the articles of his I've read. And all of his pious feelings are retreads that were already thousands of years old by the time the Pharaohs arrived on the ancient scene. How can someone who wears his heart on his sleave and who is devoid of original ideas be ahead of his time? His only value to me is as a weathervane pointing to the latest alleged moral combat explaining world events: i.e. the latest conspiracy theory propounded by moralizing armchair generals for whom systems of ideas are too complex. It's half-wits like Pepe who give the free press, and the left wing especially, such a bad name with those in the know. Relying on the press for one's opinions is a disaster.
-
Other dude: At least pepe has the guts and will to go where white trash dont dare. Where the story is at... And when you are the only one there, guess you can make up the stories since there is no one else who can challenge you on the facts.
-
Biff: There are reporters dime-a-dozen in practically every location Pepe's gone to. Everybody and there dog who graduates with a bachelor of arts wants to be a reporter. That's why there are so many all over the planet (and why they work for so cheap). And since book writers are also dime-a-dozen, there are books covering literally every subject he's ever covered as well. Pepe does nothing original. He's incapable of originality. It shows in every post of his.
-
And it takes no guts to trot out a leftist line in the year 2004. Left-wing politics have a long, long history. Jack London gave socialist speeches and wrote editorials in the nineteen-teens. Helen Keller was arrested in the 1920's campaigning for socialism. Since the Great Depression of the 1930's, left wing politics have been VERY popular with the educated 'white trash' of America. They still are.
-
We can agree or disagree with Spengler, but he tries to be original. He has guts. When Pepe does something like Spengler, then I'll respect him.
-
But Pepe won't, because he can't. Anyone who can, does. Originality in almost any form is potentially highly lucrative in the media, whether it's the press, Hollywood, radio, or whatever.
-
Michael Moore must be worth over US$100 million by now. Why? Because he did something original. He 'invented' left-wing docu-comedy. The earlier left-wing stuff was tear-jerking material. He brought out the comedic side of what he considers tragedy (I think he's full of it, but that's for another post).
-
If Pepe had guts he would have done something like this by now. It's the obvious thing to do.
-
But it takes more guts (and more confidence and maturity) to mock people (particularly if you do it gracefully) than to commiserate with them or screech to the heavens at their sides in anger. Leftist writers like Molly Ivins of Texas, or Al Franken of the east coast, who have a sense of humor do very well for themselves. Both are 'white trash' types unless you take exception to Al Franken who I believe is/was jewish.
-
Other dude quotes John Perkins new book at length and approvingly.
-
Biff: A quick survey of John Perkin's books is worthwhile as he seems to have some choice advice on time management and saving airfare: from http://www.johnperkins.org/
-
John's earlier books have been published in 14 languages. They include:
-
Psychonavigation: Techniques for Travel Beyond Time
-
Shapeshifting: Shamanic Techniques for Global and Personal Transformation
-
The World Is As You Dream It: Shamanic Teachings from the Amazon and Andes
-
The Stress-Free Habit: Powerful Techniques for Health and Longevity from the Andes, Yucatan, and Far East
-
Spirit of the Shuar:Wisdom from the Last Unconquered People of the Amazon
-
And of course, given the above, Perkins has the full endorsement of the lunatic fringe on the left: Democracy Now!(http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/09/1526251)
-
Somehow the following review seems more likely to be somewhere near the mark: From Publishers WeeklyPerkins spent the 1970s working as an economic planner for an international consulting firm, a job that took him to exotic locales like Indonesia and Panama, helping wealthy corporations exploit developing nations as, he claims, a not entirely unwitting front for the National Security Agency. He says he was trained early in his career by a glamorous older woman as one of many "economic hit men" advancing the cause of corporate hegemony. He also says he has wanted to tell his story for the last two decades, but his shadowy masters have either bought him off or threatened him until now. The story as presented is implausible to say the least, offering so few details that Perkins often seems paranoid, and the simplistic political analysis doesn’t enhance his credibility. Despite the claim that his work left him wracked with guilt, the artless prose is emotionally flat and generally comes across as a personal crisis of conscience blown up to monstrous proportions, casting Perkins as a victim not only of his own neuroses over class and money but of dark forces beyond his control. His claim to have assisted the House of Saud in strengthening its ties to American power brokers may be timely enough to attract some attention, but the yarn he spins is ultimately unconvincing, except perhaps to conspiracy buffs.Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
-
Other dude: Why don't you look up general smedly... Maybe you can drag that punks name through the dirt since it wont fit your world view..
-
Biff: I know about smedly. And about U.S. Grant's comments about the Mexican War. And about Thucydides slamming of Athens in ancient Greece. But you need to check the people you quote before quoting them. You linked to John Perkins at Democracy Now! in another thread. The guy's a nut who believes in psychic transportation. He's written an entire book on this. And several other nutty volumes too. Do a google search and brace yourself.
-
Have you watched the democracy now interview on video yet? Check out his rationalization of how he gave in to serial bribe-taking. He ought to do standup.
-
I used to toe the left-line somewhat, but I realized I was being hustled after I hit the stacks at the library. There's a lot of hustlers out there. On both the left and the right. All I'm trying to do is base my world view on something broader than journalism and internet links.
-
Biff Cappuccino

Friday, November 26, 2004

After reading Sarah Whalen's wacky commentary in Wednesday's ATol and noticing her claim to write for the Arab News, I was naturally curious as to who she was. Well, she's a 50 year old American from the state of Louisana who believes that the several hundred tribes of American Indians inhabiting the continent only spoke one language as she informs us here:
-
The Indians, dispossessed, complained that “white men” spoke with “forked tongue.” Their language had no word to describe Americans’ especially duplicitous form of lying. “Forked tongue” — a split-ended snake’s tongue going two opposite ways — was as close as they could come to describe an American mouth in which one set of single-sounding words came out in two opposite-meaning directions.
-
-
In another enlightening article, she states that the US needs religion in order to put the teeth back into secular US law. Exhibit B: "few ideas are more powerful than Islam. It is Islam’s all-pervasiveness that alarms the West... An Islam relegated to a Friday congregational sermon and communal exchanges of goodwill is what the West is looking for. The Shariah of course will be the first thing to go, Western culture having totally stripped the law of its power to cause fear and instill obedience. No more of those “barbaric” punishments."
-
-
In the context of this article, it's pretty clear that she wishes America to be administered under none other than Sharia law.
-
But none of this is as interesting as her pedigree. Check out the following from:
-
Who is Sarah Whalen?
-
Well, she's an Islamist apologist and the author of several deranged and incoherent articles that have been published over the past several months at the ever-titillating Arab News and The Palestine Chronicle. Among her other accomplishments, she's managed to blame Daniel Pearl and Nicholas Berg for their own murders and either Israel or the Bush administration (often both) for all of the world's other evils.
-
A sample (from the Pearl article):
-
But what largely incenses Muslims all over the world should trouble everyone — Israel’s power to compel obedience from the most powerful nation on earth. Danny Pearl was killed not for “being” Jewish, but for what “Jewish” has come to mean, rightly or wrongly, in a part of the world that sympathizes and suffers with those the Israelis have dispossessed from land, from culture, from civil rights. Danny was killed not by powerful actors in service of some evil ideology, but by those powerless before Zionism, an ideology that sacrifices Palestinians for “freedom” and “security”. . .
-
Really.
-
And from her latest: The Mahdi army is on the move again. It’s the Energizer Bunny of Iraqi urban militias. What makes it keep going and going and going?Neocons insist it’s Shiite cleric Moqtada Al-Sadr’s deep hatred for America. But what if the Mahdi army and Sadr are fighting because they love democracy, particularly freedom of speech and freedom of the press?What if some Iraqis don’t trust getting their news from the “occupier?” What if they are willing to fight and die for the right to talk their own talk?Is it just coincidence that last March’s Shiite uprising boiled over when then-US Ambassador Paul Bremer arbitrarily closed Al-Sadr’s daily newspaper, Al-Hawza, for “spreading anti-American views” and calling Bremer names?
-
This is a woman whose relationship to reality appears to be somewhat tenuous. So I wasn't too surprised to find that I'm hardly the first to question her incredibly elusive credentials.
-
Sarah Whalen teaches at Loyola University School of Law, New Orleans; she is an expert in Islamic law and taught Islamic law at Temple University School of Law.
-
That's what she was claiming a few months ago. More recently, though, she apparently chose to drop Temple:
-
— Sarah Whalen is an expert in Islamic law and teaches law at Loyola University School of Law in New Orleans, Louisiana.
-
She doesn't just "teach" at Loyola University School of Law, by the way, she's a professor (don't miss this story - the professor angle is important). But, perhaps because a check of the Loyola University School of Law faculty doesn't show her name, she's now switched to the past tense:
-
— Sarah Whalen is an expert in Islamic law and taught law at Loyola University School of Law in New Orleans, Louisiana.
-
Did she? The only mention of her teaching at Loyola that anyone's been able to find to date (and it's apparently now long gone) was a single course at the Department of Religious Studies (not School of Law) entitled "Islam, Muhammad, and the Qur'an," and she was listed under the category of "extraordinary faculty" as an "instructor."
-
WTF?
-
But wait! When she spoke earlier this year at Penn State's Dickinson School of Law, an institution that's probably a little more scrupulous about checking academic credentials than, say, Arab News, Al Jazeera or The Palestine Chronicle, her rather extensive CV included no mention of Loyola whatsoever and no mention of her teaching at Temple. Which isn't to say that it wasn't an impressive CV. In fact,
-
A frequent contributor to publications such as Arab News and The Palestine Chronicle, Whalen is widely published in both the United States and the Arab world on issues relating to international and Islamic law and on subjects ranging from the invasion of Panama to terrorism in Japan. She is certified to practice law in three states and is a seasoned litigator in the fields of personal injury, class actions, domestic relations and criminal law.As a former research assistant for Dr. Piero Gleijeses at the School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University, Whalen conducted extensive archival research on U.S. foreign policy, Cuba, Africa, and several Cold War projects. She also served as a consultant on international security issues for the United States Armed Services from 1984-1989 and worked as an attorney advisor at the United Nations Headquarters in New York from 1984-1986. Whalen holds a B.A. degree in anthropology from the University of Miami; a J.D. from New York Law School; an M.A. in History from New York University; and an LL.M. from Temple University School of Law. She also specialized in comparative public and private international law while attending The Hague Academy of International Law in the Netherlands.
-
Wow. I honestly don't know what to make of this.
-
Especially since there's not one reference to most of these credentials anywhere else on the internet, either. She does appear to practice law with a New Orleans firm and her B.A. and J.D. degrees, at least, are listed in Martindale-Hubbell (but not her LL.M., which is odd, since an LL.M. is an advanced law degree, which she allegedly earned eight years ago). Well that, at least, seems to pin her down a bit.
-
But, no, a Google search for her law firm turns up only one hit, which turns out to be a user post (scroll down about 3/5 of the way) at Free Republic in which someone is attempting to track down, you guessed it, the credentials of the elusive Ms. Whalen. The post shows a listing from lawyers.com in which yet another version of Whalen's history is displayed, this one including a stint as "Lecturer and Adjunct Professor" at Loyola, with no mention of the Law School.
-
Unfortunately, I was unable to duplicate the results of that lawyers.com search. My attempts yielded 0 results. And it further appears that the name of the firm has changed, their website is "under construction," and no reference to the new firm includes a reference to Sarah Whalen.
-
Here's a item of interest: she was appointed legislative liason for the River Region Caucus of the St. James Parish last year. I think this is pretty solid, but basically irrelevant.
-
So who is Sarah Whalen? I have no idea. And it doesn't appear that anyone else does, either. Maybe she's just a really private person.
-
(I can't leave this topic without mentioning that The Blue Octavo Notebooks has been on to Ms. Whalen for quite some time.)

Sunday, November 21, 2004

Hi D.: Michelle Malkin is always doing that kind of right-wing revisionist stuff. I'd have to see her arguments to see if I thought she's making sense. Her reviewer didn't strike me as having much per logic skills and seemed just a tad flighty to boot: I don't trust the reviewer's judgement much. As to the revision of McCarthyism, Ms. Colter is awfully strident but I'm inclined to agree with her basic premises: (a) McCarthyism has been hyped to all get out and (b) that McCarthy was correct about the existence of commies. Indeed he underestimated the number as released CIA files have since demonstrated.

Was reading a rant about Tom Delay being involved in sweatshops working Chinese workers to death at 84 hour workweeks. Didn't persuade me too much as I used to work 84 hour workweeks in Canada and wanted to work 100 hour workweeks but the idiot government of Ontario taxes the hell out of you the more you work thus strongly discouraging the effort. 84 hours/week = 7 days at 12 hour shifts. Which is what I did at an apple orchard. Seasonal work is like that. You sleep through the winter and work like the Dickens during the summer and fall. I'm sure the Chinese workers doing this are working for several months to a year and then moving on with their savings.

Why punish poor people by not letting them work overtime if they want to? In New Brunswick, as recently as 1990, I had been working about US$2.25 forty hours a week. You can't win at those wages and so I left for Toronto's suburb of Burlington to work for US$5 an hour, living in the orchard and working 12 hour shifts on the apple press. I lived and worked sweatshop conditions for three months and left with my wallet bulging. Was I taken advantage of? I've also worked these sort of hours in Taiwan when you combine Howard and outside work together. Which was how I've been able to take five-month vacations every year for the past ten or more years. In its effort to protect me from myself the US left-wing would limit me to forty hours a week and a two or four-week vacation every year. The left's inadvertant contempt for the worker strikes again...

With the right, you get something approaching honesty: for example, the best-selling book, "Greed Works." Even if the left agreed, it would have to package it in pieties. The left is as contemptuous and racist, when all is said and done, concerning minorities as the right: it just employs hypocritical, and thus even more farcical and incompetent, policies than the right. Minimum wage is an excellent example and so is packing racial preferences at schools. The road to hell is paved with well-intentioned morons...

Libertarianism, a sort of zen of policy -- i.e. a hands-off, live and let live, natural and respectful-of-others approach -- is the best thing I've seen so far.

My 50 cents worth...

P.S. Malkin, via a search of C-span.org, can be seen and heard in the flesh if I'm not mistaken...

Biff Cappuccino....
Letter to www.ATol.com:
-
Re: "Nanjing Massacre Claims Another Life": I must say I quite enjoyed Victor Fic's statement that: "None other than luminary historian Stephen Ambrose deemed [Iris] Chang one of America's most promising young historians." For those of us who actually read history, Stephen Ambrose is most famous for being caught out after 30 years of serial plagiarism. A google search of his name will produce interesting articles on the matter from Slate.com, weeklystandard.com, Forbes.com, etc. Then again, given Iris Chang's own bent for plagiarism, it's only appropriate that Ambrose would be quoted lavishing her with praise. Honor among thieves. For example, the second paragraph from page four in Iris Chang's Introduction appears stolen from a Chinese Communist Party document, given its stale Communist epithets (beneath the boot of...), it's hyperbole ("unmitigated evil lying") and the chauvinist Communist Chinese perspective as in "some foreigners witnessed the horror". It would appear that she was in too much of a rush to either accredit her source or touch up her translator's English. Probably both. And an amateur historian in Japan, Timothy M. Kelly, has a lengthy review including a 2000 word section where he cites instance after instance claiming that Iris Chang stole extensively from David Bergamini's Japan's Imperial Conspiracy. Do a google.com search and you can decide for yourself whether his claims are credible. Either way, there are far more worthy books around on the subject such as The Good Man of Nanking: The Diaries of John Rabe and Masahiro Yamamoto's Rape of Nanking: Separating Fact from Fiction. In my view, atrocities certainly did occur but neither on the scale nor of the best-selling variety that Iris Chang proposed. In the end, like Pearl Buck before her, she was just another hustling messiah of the downtrodden making a good living pulling the public's nose.
-
Biff Cappuccino, Taipei

Saturday, November 20, 2004

Recent letters of note from Atol. These are too amusing to let fall into the memory hole. Kept in original order. My reply to Travan’s letter is at the very bottom. Biff Cappuccino

If D Bhardwaj [letter, Nov 18] feels uncomfortable discussing English-speaking Indian elite's behavior, I will quit posting that. However, if you would like to have a free academic discussion of how dogs behave, I would love to offer my opinions. As a dog owner or master, you should pay more attention to the articles published about dogs. Dogs like to imitate (or mimic?) their masters. They always dream [that] one day, they can be equal to their masters. Jumping on to the driver's seat where their masters often sit is one obvious behavior. You love your dogs. You make them live a similar life as you do. I am sure your dogs are happy to live under your roof too. However, you would never regard your dogs as equal to your kind. Do you? That is why equality cannot be earned just by being the best friends of white men. It has to be earned independently with your own tradition, culture, honor and dignity. If you only care about the food you are eating, what is the difference between you and your dog?
-
FrankSeattle, Washington (Nov 19, '04)
-
-
Dear Frank [letters, Nov 18 et al]: Please stop your ranting. It has crossed into the zone where therapy would be strongly recommended. Your xenophobic spiel does no one any good be they white, yellow, brown, black, etc. As a Chinese, the unchecked chauvinism reminds me of how the "Central Kingdom" lost its way from the Ming Dynasty to the ill-fated Boxer Rebellion. I would offer you a "Da Xie" if you would temper your observations.
-
Tino TanSingapore (Nov 19, '04)
-
-
I have to say that I am surprised that ATol has continued to publish Frankie boy's rather whimsical and outright racist anti-Indian rants every day. (He isn't your CEO, is he?) The sheer hypocrisy of his arguments is hard to miss for any logic-abiding individual generally aware of current and past happenings in the globe. He tells us that it is OK for Chinese to learn English, but has been screaming foul weeks now about Indians doing the same. How sweetly convenient! He makes a rather incredible claim that the Chinese culture and language have not changed in the last 5,000 years - a claim which any objective historian should be able to trash without much difficulty (the Buddhist culture in China, for one example, was originally imported from outside). These days the Chinese are aping Western culture like never before. Women dyeing their hair blond and getting a nose job done, to Chinese students in the US dumping their own family traditions merely to get free lunches at the local church or Chinese teenagers adulating the Japanese stars who are seen as more Westernized. Having apparently bartered their attire and family values for Wal-Marts and Nike shoes, the well-off Chinese are even changing their names to Western names, for little rhyme or reason. As far as the economy goes, undoubtedly China has made huge progress in the past 20 years, but if you analyze closely you'll see that a large part of it is because it has successfully served as a hub of cheap (or is it "slave"?) labor to big Western corporations. There appears to be neither any significant private enterprise in China nor any significant innovation of any kind (quite unlike Japan). Talk about serving "white masters" ... Same also looks true for language. When most of the textbooks written in Chinese are nothing but translated replicas of original research papers done in English, and most original literature (arts/poetry/free speech) is promptly suppressed by a nasty nanny-like regime, it raises serious questions on the success of Chinese language (which Frank so loves to gloat upon). But I personally wouldn't judge China based on these relatively superficial/insignificant things. I believe that mass change is inevitable for any society, and must be dealt with in a useful way, not by running the cheap enterprise of shaming people for wiggling their tails and whatnot. Frank, incorrigible as he comes across, however, doesn't have any qualms about judging India similarly. Clearly, he has not learned the Chinese equivalent of the proverbial advice of not throwing stones if you live in glass houses ... or is there not one? Not even in a translated Chinese textbook?
-
Rakesh India (Nov 19, '04)
-
We continue to run Frank's letters because we are learning so much about dogs. - ATol
-
-
Daniel McCarthy and Biff Cappuccino [letters, Nov 18] display the same narrow world view, which is proof enough that those living in free societies can become even more limited in their understanding than those living in "unfree" societies. I never said that it is better to live in an unfree society. That is a foolish thing to believe, as all people would prefer to live freely and in peace. But the fact is, free societies are not the only ones [that] have produced wise and cultured people. In fact, I would argue that the vast majority of the great writers of the world have lived in harsh and unfree conditions. But Mr Cappuccino and Mr McCarthy worship at the altar of America and modernity. They bring their modern pantheon of [George W] Bush, [Mark] Twain, [Oscar] Wilde, [Somerset] Maugham, and [Paul] Theroux. This pathetic group of gods they have created for themselves shows the limits of their mind. While I am writing of Du Fu, Su Shi, [William] Shakespeare, Cervantes and Ferdowsi, they are fulminating against Jane Fonda, or proudly boasting about "libraries, TV, and Hollywood". Cappuccino's knowledge of Ah Q is quite impressive from someone who claims to know Chinese and still calls Du Fu and Su Shi "storytellers". Su Shi and Du Fu are two of the great poets of classical Chinese. Some would say only the Book of Odes and Li Bai can compare to their work. Lu Xun is a very small figure in Chinese letters, but I suppose he is the only one famous enough for Mr Cappuccino to know about. How can someone like essays so much and not know that the form was vibrant in China at least 2,500 years ago? If you like essays, why don't you read Han Yu's "Yuan Dao" (The Original Path), which 1,200 years ago argued for expelling foreign influences from China (he was referring to Buddhism)? It is because Mr Cappuccino's masters, the "libraries, TV, and Hollywood" of the US, have erased all knowledge of his own culture from his mind. He doesn't know or care about the vast body of poetry and prose in his own language, but is obsessed with a handful of foreign writers writing about foreign lands and foreign people. How sad for someone to know nothing of their own ancestors. I have nothing against the US or the West. It is the unthinking servility to their culture that I am against. I'd rather be an Ah Q than a submissive mama-san, Mr Cappuccino. By the way, Mr McCarthy, in America, we don't call people by their first names until invited to do so.
-
G Travan California, USA (Nov 19, '04)
-
Did Su Shi and Du Fu have anything to say on the subject of dogs? - ATol

Biff to Dr. Travan: Prior to you mentioning his name, admittedly I'd never heard of Du Fu. I looked him up on the web, was appalled, but in the interest of brevity didn't mention him in the last letter. The problem with Du Fu as a poet, as I see it, is that he has practically nothing to say. Let's take a look at one of his poems, a fairly representative one at that:

Enjoying Flowers Walking Alone on a Riverbank (1)

Before Huangshi pagoda the river flows east,
In spring's brightness I'm tired and need the breeze.
An ownerless clump of peach blossom's opened,
Is dark or light red more to be loved?

This is simply someone in touch with his own feelings. For modern folk, it's woefully understated to the point of sounding shallow, even artificial, and hence unattractive. It comes off as the sort of exciting blank-charge nothingness prized by high school teachers intimidated by works of ideas which test their mettle and have the potential to be controversial and hence dangerous. Safety is found in breezy blather which can stretched and spun in any direction. Nobody is wrong. Holding steadfast to an opinion is not just narrow-minded, but becomes an offense. Hence the popularity of furry academic jargon. Hence the popularity of multiculturalism. Hence Mr. Travan.

Many of Du Fu's works remind me of the Police song, "Every Breath You Take." When most people heard it (myself included) they thought that it was a simple but pretty love song. It turned out to be the theme song to the political drama, 1984, and is actually about the sinister Nosy Parkerism of totalitarian régimes and their very close watch of the intelligentsia in particular. But then again, Sting has been forthright in interviews stating that he deliberately writes lyrics with fuzzy edges. He found that if he expressed himself too clearly, then people would make a decision about what he wrote and would then agree or disagree. Perhaps half of his customers would abandon each song based on something bothersome in the lyrics. On the other hand, if you write with less clarity and let people fill in the dots with whatever stuffing they please, sort of allowing them to DIY the song lyrics, the customers tailor them to their own idiosyncrasies and find, unsurprisingly, that they like them. Sting and the lads took the credit for our mental labor and laughed all the way to the bank.

But with Du Fu, there's almost nothing there to DIY. About the best you can say about him is that he's in touch with nature, that he enjoys communing with the natural world. But even this overstates it. Because there are no ideas, no concepts. It's pure sensuality. And his vaporings are far below what's required to fit the bill for artistic appreciation in our era. He's more on the level of a horse pleasantly lowing in a field, mulching green grass, the wind passing through his mane, only a few gnats harassing his backside. About the best you can say about this body of his work is that it's a sort of MTV-style hit-and-run kaleidoscope of word pictures; just a random smattering of pictures thrown at a simple audience meshugga with rhythm and not wanting the distraction of ideas. You could say that in its homely way it's observant, but you can't argue that it's intelligent.

Now you may not want intelligence in your poetry. That's fine. But, for better or worse, I do. And intelligence requires free thought and the cross-fertilization of ideas that comes from unimpeded access to books, personalities, and ideas. In terms of English poets, you're probably happy with Coleridge and Wordsworth, whereas, given my impatience with the obvious, I prefer people who say something new. I don't want a restatement of what I already know.

From Song of the Wagons:

We know now having boys is bad,
While having girls is for the best;
Our girls can still be married to the neighbours,
Our sons are merely buried amid the grass.

Isolated, it glimmers for a moment. But in the original poem it’s just another plain statement of the obvious, just another platitude awash in a sea of platitudes. I might as well be expected to remain excited with a Morrissey lyric when I’m 40.

Thus, though I very seldom read poetry, when I have, I’ve preferred the war anecdotes set to rhyme of Rudyard Kipling and the freshly-baked citified notions that T.S. Elliot set in blank verse.

Biff Cappuccino
Hi Rich: Thanks for the heads-up.

Re: Dedicated to Democracy by Corey Robin

More sneaky maneuvers. I’d be suspicious of the following comment: It was a useful meeting for Reagan. 'Well, I learned a lot,' he told reporters on Air Force One. 'You'd be surprised. They're all individual countries.' Dan Quayle took a terrific beating for this sort of thing and then I saw an interview with him on C-Span done two years after he was vice-president and I was shocked at how articulate and knowledgeable he was. I realized I’d been hustled by the media.

Here’s another quote I’d be leery of: While it's tempting to ascribe the omission to American amnesia, a more likely cause is the deep misconception about the Cold War under which most Americans labour. To the casual observer, the Cold War was a struggle between the United States and the Soviet Union, fought and won through stylish jousting at Berlin, antiseptic arguments over nuclear stockpiles, and the savvy brinkmanship of American leaders. Latin America seldom figures in popular or even academic discussion of the Cold War, and to the extent that it does, it is Cuba, Chile and Nicaragua rather than Guatemala that earn most of the attention.

Latin America seldom figures in popular or academic discussion? What? Oliver Stone and James Woods first big movie was Salvador, set in 1980’s Guatemala. The US left does nothing but bring up Central America when flinging mud at the right wing. The massacres by right wing death-squads are their mainstay about how the Cold War was fought wrong. The first tell-all about the CIA, and a major best-seller, was written by an agent stationed in Latin America, Philip Agee, who exposed real agents by using their real names which led to a couple of CIA people being assassinated in short order. His US citizenship was revoked as a result.

Cuba is constantly in the news. Constantly. Always has been. John F. Kennedy’s worst moment was the Cuba Bay of Pigs invasion which failed and his best moment was the Cuba face-off with Russia, with the left wing always reminding everyone that he lied to the American public and sold out European security interests in Turkey to keep missiles out of Cuba.

Cuba is still in the news regularly. Boat people are constantly fleeing from it and their bodies floating up on the coast of Florida. Cuba hosts a number of American criminals who went there for safe haven. The Clinton decision to return the young boy Elian Gonzalez to Cuba was one of the most talked about issues of the 1990’s. Though it probably didn’t get much international attention, it was huge domestically because it divided the left and right wing right down the middle over family values, political correctness, multiculturalism, etc. and it lasted for months while the relatives got their mugs in the press, screeching and talking out of both sides of their mouths. A real soap opera. The press loved it. The right wing was for keeping him in democratic America with his relatives whereas the left wing was for returning him to his father in Cuba. The Clinton administration marched something like a 40 member SWAT team into his relatives’ home under the press’s cameras to forcibly repatriate the boy.

Ronald Reagan’s biggest scandal was Iran-Contra which was HUGE. It was like Watergate all over again. The first thing I associate with Reagan isn’t the ending of the Cold War but Iran-Contra. The Contras were the right wing Nicaraguan rebels supported illegally by a deal which illegally sold weapons to Iran and used the profits to fund the Contras.

And everyone on the left knows about Guatemala and the United Fruit Company. This is infamous stuff. It’s part of their mantra against the right. As is the infamous School of the Americas in Georgia which continues to train Latin American police in interrogation methods.

That the average Joe is as ignorant of this stuff as he is of how free speech came about in the US, or why the Civil War was fought, or that the first man to die in the War of Independence was a free black man (Crispus Atticus), would not surprise me. But academics are familiar enough with all this stuff and also quite aware that Latin America was heavily involved in the Cold War.

Here’s another good one: Reading like an excerpt from Gogol's Dead Souls, one advertisement from 1922 announced the sale of '5000 acres and many mozos colonos who will travel to work on other plantations'. (Mozos colonos were indebted labourers.) While unionised workers elsewhere were itemising what their employers could and could not ask of them, Guatemala's peasants were forced to provide a variety of compulsory services, including sex. Two planters in the Alta Verapaz region, cousins from Boston, used their Indian cooks and corn grinders to sire more than a dozen children. 'They fucked anything that moved,' a neighbouring planter observed. Though plantations were mini-states - with private jails, stockades and whipping posts - planters also depended on the army, judges, mayors and local constables to force workers to submit to their will. Public officials routinely rounded up independent or runaway peasants, shipping them off to plantations or forcing them to build roads. One mayor had local vagrants paint his house.

How much different was the situation in the US? Mencken describes judges and prison wardens rounding up vagrants and putting them to work illegally. Mencken describes this in something approaching an approving tone! Black workers in rural US had it very rough at this time. Many were in a position similar to that above if I’m not mistaken. Rape and lynchings. Slavery was traded for share-cropping. They were all thrown off the land in the late 1940’s when mechanical harvesters became efficient. Very few civil rights at any time. My point is that rather than there being a double standard, advances in human rights and dignity took place in advance in the home country first as usual, with the ‘colonies’ following one stage behind. This is the same pattern as in Asia. I suspect this guy doesn’t know his history.

More fun: Galvanised by the New Deal… The author being left-wing, and thus reliably naïve about economics, praises the New Deal. However, the New Deal of Franklin Roosevelt was a complete disaster launched by political quacks who passed themselves off as economic Einstein’s (the press called them the Brain Trust) and who went a long way to kick-starting the Second World War by virtue of severely botching the US economy and preventing any chance of global economic recovery. (The New Deal was so silly it has to be studied in its own right to be appreciated and it’s an encouraging lesson in how much more intelligent and competent politicians and the public are today. Another New Deal is impossible to imagine given the lessons learned and today’s access to information.) A never terribly strong continental Europe and Japan suffered terribly and resorted to increasingly desperate measures. One of which, unfortunately, was war.
-
Great rhetoric here. Moving, serious stuff. 'If I hadn't studied Marx I would be chicha ni limonada,' Reyes told Grandin. 'I'd be nothing. But reading nourished me and here I am. I could die today and nobody could take that from me.'

Again: I could die today and nobody could take that from me. Pardon? And this nonsense is followed up a few lines later with this: As Guatemala's archbishop complained, the Arbencistas sent peasants 'gifted with facility with words' to the nation's capital, where they were 'taught . . . to speak in public'. More comedy.

The coup de grace: During the 1954 coup, the CIA turned to Madison Avenue, pop sociologies and the literature of mass psychology to create the illusion of large-scale opposition to Arbenz. Radio shows spread rumours of an underground resistance, inciting wobbly army officers to abandon their oath to the democratically elected president. This is true as far as memory serves and should be emphasized. Arbenz’s people abandoned him because they believed bogus radio reports about an army approaching. They panicked and ran. The CIA could only rustle up two pre-WWII planes to assist in the coup and the pilots had to drop hand-grenades by hand from the cockpit. That was the sum and total of the armed forces that overthrew a sovereign nation. A savvy radio announcer and two pilots dropping hand-grenades from planes was enough to rout the country’s armed forces. Injects even more comedy into the term “banana republic”. If the nation’s people were so galvanized by Marxism and the New Deal then why did the whole thing fall apart so fast? What happened to the peasant's newfound appetite for thinking and talking?

Something’s funny with this story…

What does this mean? But the collapse of Communism and disappearance of Marxism have eased the burdens of intelligence. What burdens of intelligence? What does this fluffy phrase mean?

Facing a new enemy, which does not make the same demands that Communism once did, today's intellectuals wave away all talk of 'root causes': history, it seems, will no longer be summoned to the bar of political analysis - or not for the time being. Really? But non-fiction and biography in particular is selling in the US like never before. Fiction previously was the big seller. Serious history sells these days.

This guy’s positively moony, braying rhetoric and in love with lavender words at war with sense. And I can’t help but pronounce as frauds people who talk with confidence about Marxian economics and yet clearly haven’t given economics in general any serious self-study. These milquetoast goofballs give me a pain.

By the way, this poetaster (yup, that’s a real word) is on C-span.
http://www.booktv.org/history/index.asp?schedid=316&segid=5118
-
Biff Cappuccino

Thursday, November 18, 2004

My reply follows this letter below from atimes.com:
-
There seems to have been some controversy caused by what I thought was an obvious truism: "It is a cruel joke of history that troubled times tend to produce the most gifted of men." Biff Cappuccino writes [letter, Nov 16] that Cervantes is "hardly a first-rate writer ... most likely because he wrote at a time when free speech was insufficiently protected". Then he goes on to name [Paul] Theroux and [H L] Mencken as great writers. I suspect Biff and a frighteningly large number of Asians view Anglo-American culture as the pinnacle of world culture. And by extension, they revere writers from Japan and Taiwan who slavishly imitate their white masters in the UK and US. Biff's narrow view of the world sees writers as boring little typists producing reading material for bourgeois drones on the subway. In any case, gifted people of the past weren't just "writers" as we think of them today, but often officials, painters, musicians and adventurers. Biff also states, "And as to the claim that conflict produces the best writers, I have to wonder who he's referring to?" I am referring to Du Fu, Gunther Grass, Mikhail Bulgakov, [Fyodor] Dostoevsky, [Akira] Kurosawa, [Charles] Dickens, [Alexandre] Dumas and others who wrote about the turbulent times they lived in. Open up your mind, Mr Cappuccino, the world is bigger than Taiwan, Japan, America and England. There are fascinating people living in Africa, India, South America and everywhere, not just in the lands of your colonial masters. Try reading a book by [Jorge Luis] Borges or [Amos] Tutuola, and you might enjoy it! There is more to the world than "legally protected free speech" and "multiparty democracy", believe it or not. It is an insult to all of our ancestors to see these modern political rights as prerequisites for culture and wisdom. The culture of free societies is mostly a glut of shallow entertainment which has nothing to teach those living under repressive governments. I take offense at Daniel McCarthy's comparison of me to Jane Fonda, a ditzy and typically American actress, who went on a little photo op to Hanoi [letter, Nov 16]. However, I do admire Ho Chi Minh for his moderation and wisdom. Ignorant fanatics like McCarthy, apologists for the ARP (American Republican Party), will never accept that Ho Chi Minh, though a communist, was a moderate who respected Confucian culture (his father was a Confucian scholar) and opposed war with the US. In any case, outside America people aren't so idiotic as to be frightened to death by the magic word "communist". I hope Asians in particular would have some sympathy for Vietnam's war of resistance against US invasion. Finally, what does my previous letter have to do with justifying the Chinese Communist Party? There are many talented writers and artists in China today, and they have adapted to their nation's system of government. These people don't justify the CCP's actions, but to say that all Chinese people are ignorant because of their government's restrictions on freedoms is just childish.
-
G Travan California, USA (Nov 17, '04)
-
Dear Gunther Travan: The authors you offer, as far as I know their work, are story-tellers. Care of libraries, TV, and Hollywood, those of us growing up in free countries have access to practically every sort of plot. Many of us tire of stories, turn to non-fiction and will only read fiction if it's packed with original ideas. This is where the best works of Twain, Wilde, Maugham, Theroux, etc. come in. Naipaul's essays far out-do his dry fiction. Michel Houellebecq is on his way, but still a novel or two short of truly good stuff. I don't care if the next good novel is written by a Martian. I only care that I like it.

And I don't mind if the author has a master, is a master, was a master, or is thinking of becoming a master. Speaking of which, where are these masters that you and Frank keep spotting? Are they hiding out in the satanic mills of industry with their running dogs and giving orders to their frantic fascist captains? I thought this kind of jargon went out with WWII. But maybe this is a case of China holding on to its traditions? The closest thing in modern English that I can think of is: Who’s your daddy? So, who is your Daddy? Do I have one? And if I don't have one, how do I get one?

You know, I sincerely wish the best for China. If the next brilliant author is Chinese: terrific! I can read his or her work in the original language, the way it’s supposed to be read. But I just don’t see how patriots suffering from hallucinations of nonexistent masters and nonexistent races expect to help China. It’s this sort of thinking which has held it back for a century. Lu Hsun wrote about you seventy years ago: Ah Q.

Biff Cappuccino

Tuesday, November 16, 2004

My response follows this atimes.com letter:
-
I have being reading your website articles with very much interest for about a year, I have read one-sided stories and also well-balanced down-to-earth articles, but I have not really seen anything written on the real implications of the "war on terrorism". For one, let me make you aware of what is happening in the US. Slowly the economy is picking up thanks to the need to keep our troops supplied, small manufacturers are getting government contracts with secrecy clauses as well as the big companies. The more the destruction, and success of the "insurgents", the more the need to replenish the resources the army needs. It might be immoral to exchange blood for money, but I think this is a point that somebody has to make. As seen by this way of looking at things as they parallel American reality, it is absolutely absurd and pointless to think that the coalition troops will withdraw - why should they? Sure there are casualties, but in the long run those "terrorists" with their high ideals will keep the economy going for a long time. For that the economic establishment thanks them, and the super-rich are probably praying that the "terrorists" succeed in causing a major catastrophe on US soil so that they can have even greater power. It seems that those poor misguided souls dying for their "cause" or jihad are truly playing into the plans of the master economists that control their country and ours. May God have mercy on us all.
-
Turulato
-
Re: letter-writer Turulato’s popular left-wing theory of economics, as contained herein: “Slowly the economy is picking up thanks to the need to keep our troops supplied, small manufacturers are getting government contracts with secrecy clauses as well as the big companies… in the long run those "terrorists" with their high ideals will keep the economy going for a long time.”

Turulato goes on, in so many words, to lay out the following tempting scenario: the US government pays businesses to manufacture widgets, with both businesses and government benefiting. So the government pays businesses to manufacture more widgets, with more benefits accruing to both. This goes on and on, with a steadily growing pie fitting more and more fingers. It just gets bigger and bigger and bigger. Gosh!

Except that this is just another perpetual motion machine to go alongside global warming, pyramid schemes, and each year’s new & improved world-destroying epidemic. So where do government revenues come from? Governments don’t earn money (nor can they just print it like funny money without generating massive inflation); they take it in a process called taxation (some would say they often steal it: both federal and state income tax in the US is unconstitutional, ergo the millions of US tax protesters who don’t pay state and/or federal income tax). Since the US government derives most of its money via taxes from businesses, how (in accordance with Turulato’s scenario) can businesses grow fat on government contracts when the money for these contracts is the tax drawn from their own profits? The amount of money remaining shrinks drastically with each iteration.

And who is the “business establishment?” How many sinister characters in this nebulous conspiracy has Turulato met in person? When I wanted to understand politics, I volunteered in a politician’s office. I suggest Turulato might try something similar in the economic sphere. It’s easy to do. If you really care about the subject, you will.

Biff Cappuccino, Taipei

Monday, November 15, 2004

Biff: From a forum discussion: First Yojimbo, then me:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
quote:
-------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by biff capp

Note how she leaves out the numbers of Chinese killed by the Chinese KMT (at least double the number killed by the Japs) and the numbers killed by the Chinese Communists (who in the leisure afforded by peacetime, shot and starved to death somewhere around 60 million).

In essence the problem can be reduced to this: we Chinese can kill each other, no foreigners allowed!

-------------------------------------------------

Surely you can't be serious with your "very lengthy" but empty comments/theory.

What do you think? You are some kind of western propagandist?
Do you engage common sense to opine?

Please read here:-
http://forum.atimes.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=60&whichpage=3

Please substanstiate your position!!!!

Yojimbo

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Thanks for the feedback yojimbo, but: What empty comments? How are my comments empty? What would make them full?

And, actually, I'm attacking a propagandist.

And, I've lived in Taiwan longer than any other country (I've lived in seven) and have spoken more Chinese everyday than English for the past decade. In fact, five years ago, I returned to Canada to learn English again because I couldn't speak it anymore. Am I still a westerner?

And you're not asking me to substantiate my position, as my position is that Iris Chang is a fraud. You're asking me to try to debunk your position, which is that China's population growth refutes the notion of China's CCP mass murder.

And what does "Do you engage common sense to opine" mean? I'm not trying to make fun of you but I honestly don't understand the sentence...

Nevertheless, thanks for the heads-up on the population growth. The figures for the alleged slaughter are all over the web and in the textbooks. They’re often wild and your suspicion is healthy, I agree. I pulled my figure out of a hat, without bothering to offer a footnote. I could have done so but this would only have lent the false appearance of authority. I haven't looked into this before and you're right to go after me for it.

However, as you will probably agree, China has had 2000 years of massive depopulation, followed by massive repopulation, followed by famine and war and then the whole cycle starts all over again. Lin Yu-tang, Huang Wen-Hsiung, etc. have written about this.

The population figures you give unfortunately say nothing in this context. What do they mean? They neither substantiate nor dis-substantiate. And, of course, you quoted Communist Party figures. I'm sorry, but I trust nothing by the CCP. I'm not trying to escape from your criticism, but I can't trust communists of any stripe from any country. They’re notorious liars. Sorry.

From: http://www.taiwan-agriculture.org/taiwan/rocintro3.html
According to census data, the total population at the end of 1993 was 20,944,006 (16,885,412 from Taiwan Province), having more than doubled since 1949.

From: http://www.tradepartners.gov.uk/healthcare
/taiwan/profile/overview.shtml
"In the year 2000, the population of Taiwan was 22.3 million, an increase of 12.45% over 1987...The crude birth rate, crude death rate and the corresponding natural increase rate of population in 1945 were 38.31, 18.15 and 20.16 per 1,000 respectively. These figures had fallen sharply to 15.18, 5.71 and 9.47 per 1,000 respectively in 2000."

In other words, Taiwan's population has increased around 140~150% since 1949. Does this mean that 10% of China's population was killed by the CCP? No. I have no idea what it means. But, I suspect, neither do any of us.

As to the popularity of China's government that you bring up in your other post, you know as well as I do that the CCP would lose an election in a flash. Today's atimes.com headline is: "China faces up to growing unrest: More than 58,000 major incidents of social unrest took place in China last year, up 15% from 2002..."

Hmm....

Anyway, I wish the best for China and the Chinese people. I'm angry with the ghost of Iris Chang, not with China.

Biff Cappuccino

Biff again:

Sorry: My statement "In other words, Taiwan's population has increased around 140~150% since 1949. Does this mean that 10% of China's population was killed by the CCP? No. I have no idea what it means. But, I suspect, neither do any of us." was in reference to part of another post by yojimbo where he writes:

US population growth in 50 years
Year 1949 = 149,188,130
Year 1999 = 272,690,813 [80% increase]
(this includes a lot of immigration)
[US census] http://www.census.gov

China population growth in 50 years
Year 1949 = 541 million
Year 1999 = 1259 million [130% increase]
(practically no immigration)
http://www.cpirc.org.cn/en/density.htm

If China really butcher her people, is such growth possible?

Biff again: in other words, I’m comparing Taiwan’s 140~150% population growth rate to China’s 130% growth rate. But this is apples and oranges as the internal factors of each locale are very different. This is just another case of “…statistics, damn statistics and lies.”
My reply follows the letter below:

Daniel McCarthy [letter, Nov 11] is undoubtedly one of the 59 million silly fools who cannot tell the difference between a hypocrite and a saint. Yet he has the gall to write, "Until China has freedom of information, freedom of thought, and real education instead of more silly propaganda memorization, we cannot expect much more." As letter writer Sandy Lambrecht mentioned, Americans seem to think they are a master race, justified to look down on every other people around the world. Su Shi, Du Fu, Ferdowsi, Cervantes, Thomas More and countless other brilliant men of letters around the world lived in societies where the "freedom of information and thought" was limited or non-existent. It is a cruel joke of history that troubled times tend to produce the most gifted of men. If you doubt this, then offer an example of any writer or thinker now in Taiwan or Hong Kong who can hold a handle to those in 1920s and 1930s China, which was racked by dictatorship, invasion, civil war, and social revolution. China today has far to go in improving its education system, but there are many talented people who are not simple robots churned out by some imaginary totalitarian propaganda machine. Mr McCarthy "misunderestimates" China if he thinks their "children isn't learning". Why, the typical Chinese university graduate has better English abilities than the Harvard/Yale-educated president of the US.
G Travan
California, USA

With all due respect to G Travan's taste in literati, we'll have to disagree over Cervantes. He's hardly a first-rate writer. The allusions Cervantes draws are crude and simplistic, most likely because he wrote at a time when free speech was insufficiently protected. The resulting ignorance of his reading public is reflected in the dumbing down he constantly engages in and which mars his work beyond repair. He often writes as if for children.

As to the writers of 1920s and 1930s China, Lu Hsun is highly overrated and practically unreadable to anyone except hard-core Sinophiles: a crew of aficionados infamous for their ignorance of their own national literatures. Lin Yu-Tang was a brilliant writer from that era though. But to suggest that he has no peer in the contemporary era seems an awful stretch. Li Ao, who did two stints in jail as a political prisoner in Taiwan, was an extremely prolific essayist who covered a vast range of social and political issues with wit and vast volumes of footnoted evidence. He's presently vying for a seat in Taiwan's legislature. Several years ago, he was nominated for the Nobel Prize. To his credit he didn't receive it: Nobel Prizes (like Pulitzers) are almost exclusively awarded to mediocrities. And to turn to historians (in lieu of thinkers - what thinkers?), how about Taiwan's Huang Wen-Hsiung: he's a best-selling historian in Japan (where he moved in 1964 to enjoy and profit from legally protected free speech) and is well-known throughout academic circles here in Taiwan. What distinguishes him from the pack is his willingness to face down the unholy uproar each of his books tends to produce (in one of his recent efforts, he argues that Lu Hsun's model for Ah Q, a story about a culturally retrograde moron, was in fact the national father Sun Yat-sen). His last several books have been particularly good because he's extremely concise: as opposed to the proud Chinese tradition of packing in as much stuffing and platitudes as will fit between two covers.

And as to the claim that conflict produces the best writers, I have to wonder who he's referring to? Paul Theroux is the most intelligent and engaging fiction author alive in my opinion, and he seems to spend as much time dodging difficulties as engaging them. He's notoriously shy and difficult, irritable and, no doubt, irritating. And the best essayist of the 20th century is not the politically correct George Orwell, but the politically incorrect H.L. Mencken. Mencken is by far his superior: being far more knowledgeable, wide-ranging and daring when it came to forming and expressing opinions. He lived at home with his mother most of his life. I'll leave you with the opening lines of the preface to Francis Kiernan's biography of Mary McCarthy: "Most writers’ lives are sadly lacking in drama. The dullest of people, it turns out, write witty and intelligent books. Once they push back their chairs and get up from their desks, they do little to warrant our attention."

P.S. As to the difference between saints and hypocrites: there is no difference. They’re one and the same animal.

Biff Cappuccino, Taipei

Sunday, November 14, 2004

Ode to Comedienne Iris Chang

The eulogies of Iris Chang have been unintentionally amusing, much like book blurbs are in general. This is no accident given that both are often written in haste by the same sort of glib, mutual back-slapping, dollar-chaser. This seedy subsection of the literatti seldom knows what it's on about and can't be bothered to check the facts as the membership ain't interested in knowing them anyway.

Exhibit A: The San Francisco Chronicle informs us that, "Born in Princeton, N.J., Chang grew up in Champaign-Urbana, Ill., where her parents are professors at the University of Illinois. Her grandparents' escape from Nanjing fed her early interest in what happened there. "

Grandparents? In the introduction to The Rape of Nanking, Iris Chang writes "I first learned about the rape of Nanking when I was little girl. The stories came from my parents, who had survived years of foreign revolution before finding a serene home as professors in a Midwestern American college town. They had grown up in China in the midst of World War II and, after the war, fled with their families, first to Taiwan and finally to the United States to study at Harvard and pursue academic careers in science.... but they never forgot the horrors of the Sino-Japanese war, nor did they want me to forget. They particularly did not want me to forget the rape of Nanking. Neither of my parents witnessed [the rape of Nanking], but as young children they had heard the stories, and these were passed onto me.

The New York Times edifies us with: "Fluent in Mandarin, Ms. Chang traveled to China, where she scoured archives and interviewed elderly survivors. What she learned would force her to describe the indescribable." In other words, she was forced by her fluency to describe the indescribable.

The same comedian alleges Chang's book contains the following, "So sickening was the spectacle that even Nazis in the city were horrified."

Hmm... But wasn't it a Nazi who took the initiative to establish and manage a safety zone in which the entirety of the Chinese population remaining in Nanking moved to when Japanese forces arrived (most of the urban population had already evacuated the city, with the rural population summarily driven off their land by frontline KMT forces which destroyed their property (and often their complaining person) as part of its scorched earth policy)? The 'even horrified Nazi' was John Rabe whose diaries have been translated and printed in English under the title, The Good Man of Nanking: The Diaries of John Rabe. His book is cited approvingly by Iris Chang. So, if she indeed did write this, it makes little sense in the context of the eulogy. If the quote has been fabricated by a lazy or indifferent reporter (is there any other kind?), then it shows that the reporter/eulogist/reviewer has not read much of the book at hand (do they ever?).

But this sort of name-dropping, bogus generalizing, and shibboleth slang-whanging is typical of panting, overworked and underpaid, free press hacks. Their main priority is that of any other professional: career advancement. This they achieve via getting on the front page of their newspaper section. Their venerable employer's main priority is stirring up the animals (by hook or by crook) to whip up circulation which in turns enables the paper to charge local businesses higher advertising rates. Dollar-chasers chasing dollars from beginning to end.

From my narrow truth-chasing perspective, however, it serves me no useful purpose to pretend that members of the Nazi Party were ipso facto devoted to massacring Jews and crushing liberty everywhere. The Nazi party, i.e. Germany's left-wing National Socialist Party (only slightly to the right of the Communist Party), was a political organization encompassing millions of people bearing, as with any other democratic political party, a grab-bag of different goals, opinions, tastes, morals, religious feeling, etc. In addition to rounding up and eventually slaughtering minorities, the Nazis, as a party, also enacted Europe's first maternity-leave legislation (i.e. women couldn't be fired just for being pregnant), enacted the first restrictions on carcinogenic food dyes, and the first legislation to regulate air safety levels in mines. It would take 30 years for the US to catch up to this sort of public policy making. The Nazis also established low-cost automobiles for the low-wage earning public, i.e. the Volkswagen - the folks' wagon, and constructed cruise ships that provided affordable cruises for the same proletariat. It goes on and on. As World War II historian John Toland wrote, if Hitler had been assassinated in 1938 he would've gone down in German history as a national hero. In the end, of course, Hitler launched a war and had to be stopped. But as the American reporter/author William Shirer reported while in Berlin, unlike WWI there was no celebrating in the streets at the invocation of WWII. It was not a war popular with the public.

So the phrase, "Even Nazis" is meaningless. It's like saying "even Republicans" or "even Democrats" or "even the French." Why not Freedom Fries for everyone?

There are other well-remunerated examples of half-witted nonsense that I could quote, but it gets depressing after a bit. One gets a sour taste in the back of one's mouth and wonders: These are the opinion makers? These donkeys?

You don't want to think about it. I know I don't. But a library card and cross-checking the 'plain facts' unluckily indicates to me that most of history, especially that known and fondly recalled by newspaper-devourers and TV-fanatics to bulwark their beery arguments, is just plain bunk. And this bunk has next to nothing to do with what happened and is thus useless as a guide to preventing mischief from recurring in future. And it was for emitting precisely such heresies, and pointing my accusations at the source - the very hacks of academe, my proud professors: the proud creators, nay fabricators, umm... embalmers and curators of history, that got me flunked out of grad school in Canada. Such is life.

But this loose playing with facts and fancy, stiffened up with a brace of fine-sounding or primitively emotive gobbledygook, is par for the course and operates at about the same level in Iris Chang's fine work. And with this realization, the heavens parted for me: truth, forever coquettish, finally revealed her naughty bits.

Ah! But of course! Reporters writing eulogies for an esteemed colleague much wanted in heaven for higher, finer work! Hacks lavishing a fellow comedian with hagiography. Scoundrels praising a fellow scoundrel, and in so doing, never busier a-back-slapping than today. The din of self-congratulation is deafening; the papers awash in a gush of bosh as punters leap-frog to get a piece of the publicity pie. Lies flash around the world light-speed via the WWW, before doddering truth has time to drop its cock and reach for its socks...

But why should I expect any better than botched facts, poll-parroting, and sophomoric rhetoric to constitute all the news fit to print now that Iris Chang has apparently topped herself?

From the second paragraph of the introduction written by Chang to her The Rape of Nanking: "Americans think of WWII as beginning on December 7, 1941..."

Really? No, of course they don't. Like any big lie, it seemed almost crazy enough to be true. I asked a couple of Yank colleagues in the translation office just be sure though. Not satisfied with just this, Chang kick-starts the Second World War with the occupation of Manchuria in 1931. This enables her to claim that the rape of Nanking is the biggest, baddest, and most worstest Holocaust of WWII. But this is only one of numerous sneaky maneuvers on her part.

Check this out: “No doubt, those 14 years of domination by the Japanese military were marked by countless incidents of almost indescribable ruthlessness. We will never know everything that happened in the many cities and small villages that found themselves prostrate beneath the boot of this conquering force. Ironically, we do know the story of Nanking because some foreigners witnessed the horror and sent word to the outside world at the time, and some Chinese survived as eyewitnesses. If one event can be held up as an example of the unmitigated evil lying just below the surface of unbridled military adventurism, that moment is the Rape of Nanking.”

Look at the awkward phrasing, the excessive trying-too-hard piling on of nastiness, the weird perspective whereby the reader becomes a member of a community called “some foreigners”.

Is this English? No. Not really. This is Mandarin. I’ve translated poor Mandarin into bad English for too many years not to smell a rat. This is a piece of filched CCP propaganda that she’s translated into English. Or maybe they were in on the game. Maybe part of it. It wouldn’t be the first time.

"No doubt?" and "Countless?" So we're clearly not dealing with history here; this is rhetoric, the primary weapon of the mentally feeble and logically impaired. What one cannot convince through logical persuasion, is perhaps doable via rhetoric. A case in point is the King James Bible, a beautifully worded tome, which, when reduced to plain English becomes idiotic and undecipherable, with its contradictions in even plainer view. Reduce the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx to the journalese of the financial page, and its tissue of absurdities are a dead-letter. It's no accident that Marx, like Chang, like Charles Hanley (the co-fabricator of the No Gun Ri incident of South Korea) was a successful journalist.

The newspaper is an excellent training ground for the unethical literatus to learn the ins and outs, the do's and don'ts, the elasticity of 'the facts', and the legal culpabilities (and more importantly their loop-holes) of their slippery trade. The whys, wherefores, howzitts, and prick-tease whodunnits required for perennially pulling the customers' noses comes easily afterwards.

"Indescribable": we've covered this mockery of information, this evasion of the facts, this camouflage for precision: this unwillingness of Chang to admit to her customers, that she, as self-appointed messiah and blue-stocking in chief, is not omniscient and privy to all the facts of the case after-all.

Could Chang possibly not have known that the Japanese military did not dominate China; that, as with most any other democracy (or pseudo-democracy), it was the civilian wing of the occupation government that did the dominating? Which was why Manchuria enjoyed the highest rate of industrialization and the highest living standards in China, outside of the western occupied zones of Shanghai. You might as well try to persuade me that as a child living in Uganda, the locals were under the boot of the English and suffered "indescribable ruthlessness." Sorry sweethearts, I was there.

Once the fighting is over, the grunts move over and the civvies come in. I'm not going to be convinced that my memories are less persuasive than the rhetoric of garden-variety anti-colonialists. No more than locally-born grandparents in Taiwan have ever been persuaded that the arrival of the KMT and the ensuing massacre of the intelligentsia, the national land grab, the destruction of the local currency and impoverishment of everyone's savings, the installation of martial law, and so forth signaled a reprieve from the Jap's boots and their "indescribable ruthlessness" of modernizing the infrastructure, eradicating head-hunting and cannibalism, upping the living standard, bringing in genuine law and order and quashing the mafia and gangsterism, establishing a national education and welfare scheme, etc...

"We will never know everything that happened." You can chase your tail all night with that one. Everything? Since when, where, or how could anyone ever know everything about anything? It’s another complete non-entity as a sentence, yet another puff of rhetoric sharply elbowing meaning out of its appointed place.

Page five from the introduction: "One historian has estimated that if the dead from Nanking were to link hands, they would stretch from Nanking to the city of Hangchow, spanning a distance of some 200 miles… Their blood would weigh 1200 tons, and their bodies would fill 2500 railroad cars. Stacked on top of each other, these bodies would reach the height of a 74-story building.

Using numbers killed alone, the rape of Nanking surpasses much of the worst barbarism of the ages. The Japanese outdid the Romans of Carthage (only 150,000 died in that slaughter)... it is certainly true that in this century when the tools of mass murder were fully refined, Hitler killed about 6 million Jews, and Stalin more than 40 million Russians, but these deaths were brought about over some few years. In the rape of Nanking the killing was concentrated within a few weeks."

Note how she leaves out the numbers of Chinese killed by the Chinese KMT (at least double the number killed by the Japs) and the numbers killed by the Chinese Communists (who in the leisure afforded by peacetime, shot and starved to death somewhere around 60 million).

In essence the problem can be reduced to this: we Chinese can kill each other, no foreigners allowed!

I’m not trying to be funny. I’m perfectly serious. Just browse the daily dose of Chinese xenophobia that Atimes.com hosts in its letters to the editor page. The language employed may be English, but the retrograde tribal sentiments are unabashedly Mainland China Mandarin-derived and cultural in origin. These people are that unenlightened. Or, to use an impolite phrase, they’re that fucking stupid.

And I like Chang’s touch, "only 150,000 died in that slaughter." You can feel Chang's palpable fear that you might otherwise be impressed with the number. You might pause to consider such a large figure. Fortunately she cuts in quick to remind us that it was ONLY 150,000. I get the feeling her editor slept right through the galley drafts. He was only there to sign his pay slip.

This kind of gaff in English would not be considered a faux pas in Chinese though, which is a much cruder medium full of hard-hitting blood-and-guts propaganda: i.e. it's a language still recovering from the pummeling that martial law on both sides of the Taiwan straits has given to freedom of speech and thought; not to mention to taste.

A case in point is "One historian has estimated that... [the massacre victims'] blood would weigh 1200 tons"

One historian eh? From the prestigious University of Hawaii East Asian Studies program, or from Stanford or UC Berkeley, perhaps? Not likely. Straight from the mouths of those innocents at the China Communist Party’s propaganda units.

This is part of a pattern. Again, she uses the phrase "some few years." She has a thing about the word "some", as if unfamiliar with the more appropriate "several" which would handily dispose of "some few." Again, she uses the word "foreigners", when "foreign nationals" or "expatriates" would be more in keeping with modern idiom. In other words, whether or not she in fact lifted this paragraph from a crude CCP rant, she writes like a Chinese person who learned English as a second language. When speaking (C-Span.org hosts one clumsy back-pedaling interview and one angry messianic rant), she sounds American valley-girl, but I suspect, like many of the ABC candidates who've shown up looking for work at my place of employment, she's far from American - perhaps Western is what I mean here - in terms of her thinking.

This may have something to do with the following description of her in the San Francisco Chronicle. "She was doing research recently in Kentucky and ran into some problem," he said. "She got really upset, and she flew home." ... Ignatius Ding, an activist who worked with Chang for several years in seeking to have Japan acknowledge and apology for atrocities it committed during World War II...noted that she "took things to heart" and usually became emotionally involved in the tragic stories she wrote about.

I've met this sort of minority messiah in the flesh (and am a sort of reformed one myself...haha...) and they can be trying, seldom taking a vacation from their outrage and investiture of emotional capital in whatever the hell gives them a sense of meaning. Paul Theroux has mentioned the same thing and tendency to suicide in Eastern European academics in the US when they run "into some problem." The problem Theroux mentioned is usually ethical. With Chang, I do not know. But I am curious.

So many of these messiahs, hearts-of-gold to the contrary, come down with a thump.
Sun Yat-sen, after the cobwebs of hagiography are brushed away, turns out to be akin to Yasser Arafat: pocketing donations, lathering like a workhorse to establish a fascist dictatorship, complicit in assassinations, and just generally relying on his reputation as a nation-saver to make up for his serial bungling.

Pearl Buck, in an effort that ought to have christened her glowing literary and moony-Old-China-hand reputation, established a foundation to better the conditions of East Asian orphans. She got tired of the racket and turned over the management to her bisexual boyfriend who then, along with his bed-buddies, started raping orphans from coast to coast. When the story finally leaked out and became national news, she threatened the children who had ratted to the press with immediate deportation back to Korea. After she died, it took her family seven years of litigation to finagle back that part of the estate which was owed to them and which had been ripped off by her bereaving boyfriend. As with Mother Theresa, another of these dollar-hounds, where did all the money go? After Sun Yat-sen did a tour in the nineteen-teens and raked in huge donations from Japanese philanthropists (I gather they hadn't got their boots on yet and got with the national game-plan of "indescribable ruthlessness") he pocketed the funds and never again wuz they seen. I'm shocked!

I'm also tired. So, I'll end this rant here. I'm sad to see Iris go. I would have preferred the chance to destroy her reputation while she was still alive. Hopefully Professor Chomsky will remain fit and with the living, full of whimsy and vigor, the old, weepy charlatan.

Biff Cappuccino


Tuesday, November 09, 2004

Announcement: Am back to working 12 hours a day. Will not post much until December 01.... Biff Cappuccino